|
so wait....before the snarkiness mounts...
the op seems to hinge on a linkage between the destroyed interrogation tapes and 9/11 attacks....i dont really see the linkage--the case in the op seems circumstantial, so that IF you were inclined to doubt the official line a priori, you COULD fit the tapes into it---but that presupposes an inclination to doubt a priori.
how would you argue to someone who is NOT inclined to doubt the official story that there are grounds TO doubt it?
in other words, i think the op presupposes what it could (or should, depending on your view of such things) argue directly.
the older threads on this have been mostly in paranoia...i suspect that folk have read through some of that stuff at least, so i'm NOT asking for a plot summary---just the argument, please.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|