|
I don't particular care about the report, as the previous poster said, I take it will a grain of salt, there were some obvious people listed.
By my feeling is that, regardless of whether or not some of these players took HGH, I don't really feel it gave them a dominate edge over others.
I don't think big bats like; Bonds and others who have been pointed out, have hit more home runs because of it. Farther? Maybe. But even so what are the chances that but maybe a couple of shots were homers instead of warning track catches?
I'm not a bonds supporter, but he couldn't have done what he's done without a talent to play the game.
__________________
random
|