|
I agree to some extent. I haven't read it but a few people I know have read through most of it and I trust their judgment.
There are two ways to look at the report. If you only look at the final product then yes, it is crap. Very few sources, little evidence, etc. It names some names, including some rather big names but there isn't a lot of substance.
Alternatively, you can look at the buzz it created. Some really big names were in there. That generates a lot of awareness. Also, as a result of the report, MLB will likely have better testing and they can get on with cleaning up the game.
|