|
Homeopathy isn't dangerous--at least not in the United States (or shouldn't be, see proviso). The safety of homeopathic remedies in the U.S. is overseen by the FDA (not that that means much these days for anything, homeopathy or not).
The efficacy of homeopathy is obviously something to be debated. I've found the efficacy depends on the remedy itself--some, like drospera rotundifolia, are known for being anti-spasmodics and anti-inflammatory, and are being researched for use in conventional medicines. Topically applied arnica gel has been shown to be as effective as other topically applied NSAIDs in the treatment of osteoarthritis. My personal experience with arnica is that it helps tremendously to keep bruising and swelling down, so do you think your article against homeopathy is going to change my mind? No.
But here's the thing--we need to be wise consumers, and that applies to all medicine--allopathy, homeopathy, naturopathy. Plenty of conventional medical treatments come with risk and adverse side effects. For instance, the commercial for Lipitor says that in rare cases, patients may experience muscle pain or weakness. What they don't tell you is that that muscle weakness might leave you passed out on the floor at your place of business with no ability to explain to anyone what's wrong with you (true story, happened to my mother). Every treatment--even a well-respected statin drug like Lipitor--comes with some risk.
I'm a researcher of all things, so I don't choose remedies without looking into them first--and that applies to everything, conventional medicine and homeopathy. I like to know everything about what I'm putting into my body. I think if people aren't medically literate, they're just as likely to run into problems with the conventional medical establishment as they are with homeopathy.
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
|