|
Some comments from the OP:
Interesting discussion. Some jurisdictions presume that a 17-year old who is turning 18 next week is a child who lacks the maturity to consent to sex, but 10 days later the person is an adult and what he or she does in bed with another adult is no oen else's business. If 18 years is arbitrary, then when is someone emotionally mature enough to consent to sex? 17? 15? 14? Most likely it varies according to the individual (there are some 20 year olds who shouldn't have sex), but legally we have to draw the line somewhere.
As for Lenny, I know very little about his convictions and I haven't heard his pedo podcasts, but I did look at a couple of his stories and he seems to be into 13-14 year olds, not 6 year olds. I'll go out on a limb here and admit that some 14 year-old girls do look appealing to me. But women in their 20s, 30s and sometimes even 40s look great to me too. I haven't been with someone under 20 since I was under 20 myself. I can be sexually happy without taking risks or guilt over doing something wrong or being abusive to someone. Can it really be true that 19-20 year old college boys do nothing for Lenny?
Of course it could availabilty. I have the impression that thin hot 21 year old guys are as accessible to out-of-shape 40 somethings as 21 year old female hotties are for out of shape 40 something straight men who are not wealthy.
That brings in the issue of yes, you do have some control over who turns you on. Most men marry to women who do not look like the models on the titty board (or stay married to women even when they no longer look like that after a few years & kids). It's called maturity, and the ability to have a satisfying relationship based on much more than your partners looks, age and body type.
|