analog

At 11 years old, there's no such thing as consensual (willing participant) sex with an adult. Whether they said "hey yeah that sounds like a good idea" or just get violated- either way, it's rape.

You officially have no idea what you're talking about.

A recurring theme in your posting is "if a kid is a willing participant, where's the harm?". That line of thinking makes me nervous about your already dubious tactics of shifting blame for boy rape onto "the gays" and downplaying "society"s role in protecting children by assigning an age at which it's felt that children become emotionally and mentally mature enough to consent to sexual intercourse, and are then deemed "adults" by law.

So you're telling us that "if the kid likes it, it's ok" and that age of consent laws are arbitrary and bogus. Of what, exactly, are you trying to convince us? It seems like you're trying to justify sex with a child. Seriously, there's no other way to read that.

Considering only one third (and that's a high estimate) of child molestation victims are male, I immediately find that statement to be laughable nonsense, without having to delve any further.

~

You are ignorant. I'm not calling you stupid. I am calling you ignorant. You are ignorant.