Ergo

Reason and logic are preached with great regard from the multimedia pulpits of today’s world. Almost everyone believe to follow their high paths. But if, as it is logically evident, logic cannot be based on itself, which are the dirty and extraneous forces that you follow when you are supposedly being logical. if logic cannot support itself how it is being reasonable even logical? What is actually driving behind that assumed logic? Will you address the intimate questioning? Will you dare to explore the obscure passages that lay not below or above but that in reality are the fucking sperm of that logical and unreal world?

You will not; I answer with no reason whatsoever. The quid is to identify who I refer with you, they thou or me? You don’t need an identity crisis but ears that can hear the uproar within the silences.

It is beyond any logic that humans prefer to deceit themselves. You believe that you reasonably reached that conclusion. But you don’t, [Censored]. Logic is a consistent absurd. You say that A necessarily implies B, but oh my dear liar, you wanted to go to B from the beginning so you just use that mercenary whore of logic to get you there. The problem is that you feed from your own lies, and when you later want to go C you don’t go because you need to believe in your “system”, you need to keep that B is the logical conclusion. What an absurd. What a fake scaffolding logic is. Will you learn to support yourself on the void? You [Censored].

Just look around who lead the people in the world, just some examples: Bush, Bin Laden, Paris Hilton. Neither known for their sophisticate reasoning, and still their followers think that what they believe is perfectly logical. Take a look, “war on terror” (quite an absurdity in its own terms), “the holy killing of the infidels” (no need to elaborate its ludicrousness), “sucking penises” (this one at least makes some sense). Those are the things that direct us, that move the world, not your pity logic.

So, ladies and gentleman, gracious and gallant members of this forum, esteem forum Motherators whose arduous labor taking care of us destitute children is never well appreciated and whose wisdom is unquestionable in such an absolute and rotund way, I address you in the most courteous and careful way, taking good care that my words don’t represent any challenge or defiance to your delicate minds, will the good lord preserve them, I address you as I was saying to discuss and ponder the different opinions that can be uphold about the aforesaid subject, and to ask the outstanding questions. I hope that my questioning and opinions will not make you feel uncomfortable or forcefully confronted; so help me God. You [Censored].

Infinite_Loser (sic),

Axiom I and II do not form a contradiction but a paradox; Axiom III is not declarative but its premise is invisible; Axiom VII cannot be proved as true or false. Nevertheless that is insignificant to me as I despise logic; but you should know better your own [Censored].

The significant thing is that you are overtly missing the point I am making. Regretfully you are [Censored] of your logic. You are so conditioned by it that you are [Censored] of thinking that there is an alternative way. In the end you believe that what I say comes from a twisted logic, but a logic nevertheless. But it is something very different. It is not with propositions that we can talk about that, but only with words that mean more than themselves. However those words can slap you in your dreams, my dear [Censored].

This is not about drawing puns or paradoxes that once unwrapped don’t mean anything; like the one you used to finish your post. It is about the real meaning that resides beyond logic and sometimes takes the form of paradoxes, not the other way around.

Cynthetiq,

It took me just a moment but then I realized how you deeply honor me. You don’t bother to mention which rule in the referred link I violated as appear to be none; you don’t bother to discuss it or reason about it because… you also despise reason, my friend! You say that my post cannot spur any type of discussion and in order to prove it you "shut up" the thread therefore making impossible any kind of discussion! Oh my dear that is so beyond any reason. Like a magnificent Bill O’Reilly, you always have the last word. It is because of that that I love you; you are beautiful in every single way. You have such a gorgeous reasoning.

Hence that I say (without the need of a big moustache): Logic is dead! And then the spews of the earth raise their voices and ask: who is the killer?

Think, think about that, my [Censored]. Prove me right.

There is still a doubt that I have… where questioning belongs then? How far it can go? It looks logical to question, but what if the object of the questioning is logic itself? Any reasonable person should suppress those lascivious impulses or run the risk of the uneasy stance. And it is there my friends that you should answer; should that radical questioning be suppressed? Flash me your dirty logic or your chaste absurd. I [Censored] you.