|
I keep looking back at my post and wondering where I denied the possibility of AGW*.
Nope, still not finding it.
Oh, there's that nasty little word "if." Sorry if I prefer to withold judgement on such a thing until I see sufficiant evidence from either side presented without the hyperbole, manipulation of evidence, and scare-tactics which predominate on both sides of the debate. I find many AGW evangelists to be shrieking luddites with severe issues with honesty; likewise many of the anti-AGW people are simply looking for an excuse to sit on their asses and do nothing about very real, tangible, proven and provable environmental crises. Since neither side seems consistantly capable of framing the debate in an honest way without appealing to fear, laziness, or both, I remain agnostic.
*That the planet is warming is not in doubt. I withold my judgement on the source and cause of the warming
|