Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ziadel
um, a 92 is bulkier than a glock 17? thats kinda subjective, so I'll let it slide.
the glock 17 does undercut about 10 ounces tho, I'll give you that.
I dunno where you get the locking blocks crack around 10k rounds, mebbe if you're not too bright and you feed it nato SMG rounds, but the manual states pretty clearly not to do that, you might not have had a choice tho.
I've gotten mine pretty dirty, no problems.
If it works in the states... we've got rainforest, mountains, plains, swamps, all sorts of shit here.
|
Yeah, because concealed carry can even remotely be compared to combat carry.
As for the locking block issue, try a google search.
Oh yeah, I'm certainly "not too bright", but the military doesn't use "SMG rounds", there is just one standard 9mm +p (M882 if you care).
Quote:
|
... my opinion on glocks is not at all helpful.
|
You said it, pal.