Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jac93246
I shot really well with the Glock but it never really felt good in my hand. I had changed the front sight and added a mag well for speedy mag changes. Also replaced the barrel with a Wolf. The extractor chipped on the lower corner. 25 people must've looked at it and it wasn't until three matches later and everyone blaming the loads and my grip that I finally found the chip. By that time I was done with it and went looking for another gun. I'm currently using a Beretta 92 until I find mags for the Springfield. The 92 is a slow starter because it's double action with the drop hammer safety, but it has NEVER jammed.
|
92s don't really have feeding problems, they are just heavy, bulky, and the locking block breaks on them around 10k rounds. They also don't handle dirt that well.
I'm sure it's a great gun back here in the 'States, but being forced to carry one has ruined them for me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ziadel
we've had those for nearly 100 years now, it's called a 1911.
|
I don't mean to piss in anyones cornflakes, but I would put a Glock up against any 1911, hell, any other pistol in the world for reliability.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ziadel
the glock perfection elitist atitude is prolly the worst part of it tho.
|
Elitists are annoying whatever position they espouse.