Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reconmike
Come on SM, media matters? They are in the same catagory as moveon,org.
I'm not saying that O'Reilly hasn't or doesn't do the things that MM says, but I do not see them nit picking on what Fatass Rosie or the rest of Hollyweird says. How come? Because they are not an independant watch group, they are a left sided group creating hit pieces.
And clearly Americans will never read any findings on Rosie,Penn,Sarandon and the whole lot of Hollyweirders on Media Matters because there will not be any.
|
reconmike, read the piece that I posted in the "attack on Moyers" thread, about O'Reilly and Malkin criticism of Moyers....you can watch it on video, in the article that I linked there. The video begins the instant you click on it.
When you finish watching, and reading the opposing views of what O'Reilly and Malkin "accomplished", I look forward to reading whether, if you had watched that video before you posted in defense of O'Reilly, you would still have had as much enthusiasm for posting.
Also....did you make "Fatass Rosie" such a strong target of criticism, own your own? I'm skeptical that so many of you all spotaneously decided to take on such an irrevelant entertainer, all at the same time. Do you sit and watch "the View"? Aren't there more relevant opponents to take exception to, than entertainers?