View Single Post
Old 05-05-2007, 03:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
reconmike
Thank You Jesus
 
reconmike's Avatar
 
Location: Twilight Zone
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
I doubt this is a shock to anyone, but content analysis by Indiana University has shown Bill O'Reilly to be a significant source of "spin."
[sarcasm]Of course, universities are just another bastion of the liberal elite, so we probably shouldn't trust anything they say.[/sarcasm]

I find it particularly interesting that illegal aliens are more commonly referenced as evil than terrorists. It's incredibly disturbing to me that Bill O'Reilly has such broad influence on Americans while being so utterly transparent in his rhetoric. This is a man who gets upset when he is quoted accurately and, rather than even make any attempt at defending his past statements, attacks the person/organization doing the quoting (see: Media Matters for America).

It seems to me, though, that O'Reilly may be feeling the pressure lately. He's always been a character, but he seems to be losing his temper more and more often (search youtube for his argument with Geraldo for the most extreme example). I have to wonder if he's getting pressure from up above as Fox News Channel's ratings continue to decline (while, admittedly, still remaining at the top of 24-hour cable news channels) and as criticism of him by organizations like Media Matters and the above study continue to get increased attention. Even during an interview in Ireland, he was faced with a reporter asking him about something Media Matters quoted him on.

Clearly, the majority of Americans will not read these findings. Even among the ones who do, there will undoubtedly be those who defend Bill O'Reilly by thinking "well it's true!" Nonetheless, do you think that Bill O'Reilly's influence is slowly declining? Or do you think all the effort to show him for what he is is having little to no effect and that he will be a popular and influential voice in American politics for years/decades to come?
Come on SM, media matters? They are in the same catagory as moveon,org.

I'm not saying that O'Reilly hasn't or doesn't do the things that MM says, but I do not see them nit picking on what Fatass Rosie or the rest of Hollyweird says. How come? Because they are not an independant watch group, they are a left sided group creating hit pieces.

And clearly Americans will never read any findings on Rosie,Penn,Sarandon and the whole lot of Hollyweirders on Media Matters because there will not be any.
__________________
Where is Darwin when ya need him?
reconmike is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360