* There's no crushing, no bending, no twisting
the footage is to far away to catch minute details
* Tail does not snap off
there is no torque forces acting on the plan in 9/11 it goes straight in
* Fuel filled wings do not explode on impact
it was not ripped open on the ground and airated, that happens about 3 seconds later as it does get mixed with air and does explode.
* Wing tips (which are swept back 35 degrees) sawing through structural steel
high speeds will do that.
* The building self-heals itself before the explosion
most people can't convert ntsc to pal, the person who posted that video on kazaa is one of them.
but i think the first response says it best
Quote:
You know, I just re-read your post and I decided that you're an idiot. Why not post some of your evidence here along with a copy of your letter to Congress? You bring no facts or evidence to this discussion and you assert that Morgan Reynolds is a spy.
I cite your "keep saying it over and over" post as proof that you are working against the "movement" you claim to support. In fact, given that you're basically a jerk, why don't you go kick a puppy and stomp on a kitten and stop wasting everyone's time here? I suggest you go have lunch with Ronald Wieck.
Thanks,
Fred
|
to the second link, the angle was bad, the second plane hit but they did not see it, all the say was the fuel spraying out and igniting, they called it an explosion because it was an explosion.