Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Necrosis
I was hoping for adult discussion. I did not find it in this comment.
Yes, there is a huge difference. A different party's ox is being gored. By the way, I notice Bush is addressing the complaints people have, instead of adopting the stonewalling policy so prevalent with Clinton, and so frequently carried out by Janet Reno.
Of COURSE it is an editorial. I'm not sure how anyone could think differently, and I don't play "dueling Googles." It stifles intelligent debate, especially when one or more parties overdoes it.
|
You describe your conclusions as "intelligent discussion"? You went to some "fringe site", like floppingaces.net, and took <a href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2007/03/14/i-have-to-agree-with/">the post of "Curt"</a>, there....and tried to pass it off as a compelling reason that there is no merit to the serious concern and reaction about the firing or 8 US attorneys for political reasons.
Do you really believe that your "dueling Googles" dismissal of my argument, complete with original research not dug up by "Curt" and passed off by him, and by you, as NY Times "reporting", is an adequate response.....something that holds up your end of an "adult discussion"?
I lost respect for Curt when I noticed that he listed his admin. contact on the domain registration for floppingaces.net with the street address of the LA County Sheriff's Dept. location where he works, but with the zip code from his actual Fullerton, CA home address. Domain registrations are invalid if they display false of inaccurate contact information.
"Curt" posted the link to the NY Times editorial excerpt that you used in your post. I'm assuming that he used the Sheriff's dept. street address to discourage anyone from finding out who it is that is posting the republican talking points on that site, or to intimidate anyone who is curious about him?
Can anyone post a conservative argument, or a point, that is supported by a third party source <b>that has integrity</b> and is not part of a "talking points" campaign.... or has association to one of the propagandist individuals or entities that I've posted about earlier, here?