Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sapiens
Seems like much ado about nothing. As xepherys mentioned, it's not a rule. It's just a moronic clerk. Is an article about a single moronic clerk worthy of newspaper reporting? I suppose that the article could be about rampant PCness, but they don't discuss it? What's the purpose of the article then? To support views that Muslims are intolerant?
|
I suppose...that it could help to educate the masses. Had she
known what was acceptable, and not, then perhaps Mrs. Edwards wouldn't have been so inconvenienced. Now...we
all know.
Is it discussion worthy? Who knows? It seems, to me, that we can manage to create a six page discussion about a duck crossing the street...But, I see your point.
Therefore, in the interest of providing stimulating discussion, what, if anything, should become of the hapless postal clerk. I say we seperate him from his testicles, and have him watch as his scrotum is tossed sizzling into a bonfire. But, I can see where some may think that's a little unduly harsh. Still, you have to admit...he'll think twice before doing anything this jacked up again. Right?