Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nanotech
In the video, “full collapse of Darwinism”, you can see an interviewer interviewing well known professor Richard Dawkins, an important pro Darwinist. He asked him to give an example of new organs that came to an animal via evolution. The professor just sat still and could not answer.
|
Most of this isn't worth responding to. But I just want to point out that the reason Dawkins didn't answer is because he was pissed off as he had been tricked. Dawkins flat out refuses to engage in debates with creationists, as it gives the subject an air of legitimacy which it does not have. The creators of this were dishonest in their approach to Dawkins, and if they had revealed their true motives to them, he would have turned down the interview. You can read Dawkin's version of events in 'A Devil's Chaplain'.
If you actually want to read Dawkins give an example of a new organ that arose through evolution, I suggest you read pretty much any of his thoroughly wonderful books (e.g. Climbing Mount Improbable), and you will be treated to dozens of such examples.
On a lighter note - I find it kinda funny, that I have just completed a personal study on the spontaneous emergence of altruism in a simulated environment (an "agent based model"), and being thoroughly impressed with how easy it is for altruism to arise. Now I come across a thread boldly asserting that because altruism exists, creationism must be true.
