|
Evidence isn't biased. Research and the interpretation of the evidence that is found can very well be biased, as it is in this case.
You are free to believe whatever you wish about the origin of life, but nothing you've shown can be considered actual evidence for either the existence of a god or his role in creating life. At best this could be considered evidence that evolutionary theory isn't perfect, but I wouldn't even give it that much credit as much of your arguments seem to be based on a poor understanding of what evolutionary theory actually is. Even if you were to disprove evolution that would not be evidence for creationism, because disproving one theory doesn't make another theory right based only on that fact. Creationism must be taken on faith, and there is nothing wrong with that, but this does make trying to prove it scientifically fairly useless.
|