View Single Post
Old 02-08-2006, 09:41 AM   #21 (permalink)
dksuddeth
Junkie
 
Location: bedford, tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
I hadn't run across these numbers before, although I'm troubled by the use of the phrase "innocent person". The MP shot by the cop in the other thread could be classified as an "innocent person" because he had not committed a crime, but the cop certainly hit what he was aiming for. The term "innocent bystander" would alieviate my concerns about how they collected their data, but by and large I'll accept that cops are more likely to miss. Certainly circumstances are going to dictate a lot of these numbers (i.e. shooting a hostage being used at a distance, needing to fire after a high-speed pursuit, most civilian shooting happen at closer quarters than police shootings, etc.).

I still think that you pulled the 50% number completely out of your ass, and I don't see where you've proven that point.
If you still wish to think that, nothing I say will probably ever change your mind. I know that someone else on this board accused me of pulling a number out of my ass and I haven't heard anything about it after proving myself right. I base my number upon my experience with other gun owners. Alot of us are either former military or born and raised rural folks who hunted during our youths and in to our young adulthood. I, like others, take my aim seriously but this is not to say that all cops do not. certainly the small town cops I grew up around took their marksmanship seriously while bigger city police officers tend to just concern themselves with making sure they qualify the one time a year. Again, this is not a generalization of all police officers so take it for what you think its worth. I know that those who are anti 2nd will think I'm a nutjob pulling stats out of my ass while those with real experience most likely will agree with me.

The 'innocent bystander', I would assume, would most likely be someone not involved with the incident whatsoever. The MP that was shot was NOT an innocent bystander, he was a suspect at the time. A hostage is not an innocent 'bystander', they are an innocent hostage(victim at the time).

I still stand by my statement that legal guns in the hands of legally licensed individuals are more likely to be safer and more professional about their firearms than law enforcement, on average.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
dksuddeth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360