View Single Post
Old 11-16-2005, 09:43 PM   #20 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
My original point was that you are grossly misusing the term 'estrus'. It is not meant to be applied to the human species, there is in fact a there is a phylogenic differentation on that exact point, that humans do not have estrus.
I don't think anyone is saying that humans have a biochemicaly identical cycle of fertility to animals. We know tha humans do not have an estrus exactly like animals. What this conversation is about is if some women have something similar in symptom to estrus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
My other point still stands, however, is that what you are proposing creeps me the fuck out.
'Progress'?

You should recognize the fact that what you are proposing is more or less taking advantage of people based on their hormonal level, and it is a slippery slope from there to slipping a drug into a drink, buying alcohol; even date-rape from that point.
This I consider to be a gross exaggeration. In order to understand why, you must break down what it means to consent. Let's say that a woman goes out for a night on the town right after a break up. She is emotionally suceptable to the rebound relationship or even stress releiving sex. She is emotionally suceptable, and any man who can see this could use it to their advantge, but that is not rape, as she is consenting. Let's say that a woman goes to a man's house and watches porn. She becomes aroused and they have sex. She consented, therefore it was not rape. Both of these situations involved a form of subtle manipulation, but that does not make it rape. Rape is the crime of forcing another person to submit to sex acts, especially sexual intercourse. What lampajoo was asking about is not rape, legally speaking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
Yeah. You heard me. Rape. What you are proposing is non-consensual sex, that is, normally they would not agree to have sex with you, but you are manipulating the situation and finessing it to a point where the odds are most in your favor. Some would simply stop at calling that unethical, but I think you need to get your head checked.
Do you know how my wife and I met? She was attracted to me because I was playing the piano (and my striking figure). Had I not been playing the piano, she probably would not have approached me. Am I guilty of raping my wife?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
Call me an idealist or a strict biologist, but I maintain the position that if you are having sex with someone it should be from either love or a willingness to raise children together, and preferably both. Those qualities are attained over a period of time, not due to remote-sensoring of temperature. The level of sensory equipment that you are proposing sounds a lot like stalking to me, because the only part of a woman that changes temperature during the course of the month is the genitalia, and information like that isn't readily available to the common public.
Actually, I'd call you an exaggerator, and probably someone who has personal connections with the issue of rape. Lust is the biochemical reason to have sex with someone. Procreation is the inate reason to have sex. Philosophy is the 'love' reason to have sex.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
Try imagining telling a woman that you've been monitoring her temperature for the best time to get her to agree to a quick fuck - over the course of months, as you say. Most women aren't going to like that, so it seems you aren't interested in cultivating any sort of relationship with her. That bothers me on a deep level.
I remember a night back in high school when I was at a bar (I know I wasnt 21, but at least I was over 18). Some friends and I went to a bar around the corner because we were good friends with several bouncers and the manager. We hung out and tried our lame pick ups on women there. Want to know something strange that happened? A woman picke up on me! Yes, an 18 year old boy was picked up on by what I can only guess was a woman in her mid to late 20s. She was quite attactive and quite aggressive. Do you think she was approaching me (on a conscious level) for love, procreation, or sex? She was looking for a 'quick fuck'. I didn't because I don't like herpies, but I could have. She probably wouldn't have called.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hrandani
Mods can edit, remove this post or ban me, but this is something I feel very strongly about. Ita vero.
I have no interst in seeing your post edited or removed or you being banned. I hope that you read my opposing view and consider it. Yes, indeed.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360