|
My original point was that you are grossly misusing the term 'estrus'. It is not meant to be applied to the human species, there is in fact a there is a phylogenic differentation on that exact point, that humans do not have estrus.
My other point still stands, however, is that what you are proposing creeps me the fuck out.
'Progress'?
You should recognize the fact that what you are proposing is more or less taking advantage of people based on their hormonal level, and it is a slippery slope from there to slipping a drug into a drink, buying alcohol; even date-rape from that point.
Yeah. You heard me. Rape. What you are proposing is non-consensual sex, that is, normally they would not agree to have sex with you, but you are manipulating the situation and finessing it to a point where the odds are most in your favor. Some would simply stop at calling that unethical, but I think you need to get your head checked.
Call me an idealist or a strict biologist, but I maintain the position that if you are having sex with someone it should be from either love or a willingness to raise children together, and preferably both. Those qualities are attained over a period of time, not due to remote-sensoring of temperature. The level of sensory equipment that you are proposing sounds a lot like stalking to me, because the only part of a woman that changes temperature during the course of the month is the genitalia, and information like that isn't readily available to the common public.
Try imagining telling a woman that you've been monitoring her temperature for the best time to get her to agree to a quick fuck - over the course of months, as you say. Most women aren't going to like that, so it seems you aren't interested in cultivating any sort of relationship with her. That bothers me on a deep level.
Mods can edit, remove this post or ban me, but this is something I feel very strongly about. Ita vero.
|