part of the issue is that only a small handful of contractors are able to take on these massive projects... so the same names get thrown around each time. however, washington lobbyists and appointed officials have always maintained a very incestuous relationship.
the root problem is congress' unquenchable thirst for more bureaucracy coupled with the tradition of the executive branch's ability to appoint those positions. more bureaucracies are created, which means more appointments by the incoming elected executives, which means more links in the chain, which means more congressional funding, which means more power to the lobbyists who secure that funding for their own ends.
i'm not well enough informed to cry foul in this case, but I wouldn't mind seeing some changes made in the overall process.
__________________
If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
~ Winston Churchill
|