Well...even if it seemingly makes no sense, what so ever, I hope it makes someone happy.
I could actually see someone saying they'll stop making slackers wear pink because that's saying a "girl's color" (and thus girls) represent weakness.
That I could see. For me, innocent as I am, pink is a girl's color.
Baby boy=blue
Baby Girl= pink.
(As both are very wrinkley, sometimes color coding is required.)
(Think of the possibilities there! Color coding people! If you're voted an idiot by your peers, you wear brown (because your head is up your ass); if you're mean or short tempered you wear red; if you're cool and collected you get blue; if you're excited all the time you get yellow; etc.)
Now, if these guys are slacking and having to wear pink, it must be because "girls wear pink, and you're wearing pink becuase you act like a girl." Right? That's what this is really about, I think. The whole breast cancer thing is some dumbass who got in a tiff over some imagined BS and complained. Then the idiots didn't just say "nope, I'm not seeing the connection."
However, if someone had complained becuase punishing boys by making them wear a girl's color was offensive, I can actually see the point. Maybe not agree totally, but see it.
This however? Ass stupid.
__________________
I can sum up the clash of religion in one sentence:
"My Invisible Friend is better than your Invisible Friend."
Last edited by billege; 04-05-2005 at 09:26 PM..
|