Thread: Washing machine
View Single Post
Old 04-02-2005, 07:01 AM   #12 (permalink)
james t kirk
Junkie
 
james t kirk's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto
Quote:
Originally Posted by mazagmot
james, it may not be Whirlpool, it may just be that it's a new Whirlpool. The older machines used metal for transmission couplings, whereas the new ones use plastic, as you've found out. The plastic ones don't need to be lubricated and are cheaper, but don't last as long. I'm sure an older Whirlpool would have lasted nearly as long as your parents Maytag, or at least longer than your new one did.

(sorry for the off-topic post)
True,

I liken it to the famous GM plastic intake manifold on my car that cracked and destroyed my engine. Manufacturers are ALWAYS looking to save a buck and if they can put in a cheap plastic part and save a buck they will.

My crap washer is 3 years old, and of course, the warrantee was only for 2 years. It doesn't get a lot of use since I am single. (My parent's Maytag never shut off it seemed, and never ever had to be fixed once in 30 years, in fact, it probably is still working.)

The service guy knew what the problem was without even looking at it.

All he said was "always use more water than you need to avoid overloading the agitator" So much for conservation.

A funny story.....

When I moved into my place, I didn't own a washer or a drier. My neighbours were in the process of replacing their old "Eaton" (if you are Canadian, you will know what that is.) washer and drier. They said to me that I could have both if I wanted, that they both worked, the drier was fine, the washer might last "another 6 months".

I ended up taking both (save a buck when yuo have no bucks) and they lasted almost exactly 5 years with no trouble. I remember I came downstairs one day and the washer had popped its clock and there was water all over the floor, so I figured, fuck it, I am just going to buy a new one.

I thought I was being smart and went out and bought the unreliable Kitchen Aid one.

Last edited by james t kirk; 04-02-2005 at 07:06 AM..
james t kirk is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360