KMA-628

Thanks for trying to make me look good, but that wasn't what I was trying to do.

I was pointing out that, while criticizing other's choices for thread topics, he has one clear agenda that he is trying to push--Bush/conservative bashing (which he has every right to do).

And now that Bush/conservative bashing is decreasing and people are moving onto other topics, he seems upset about it, as if the other things we choose to discuss are irrelevant.

There are multitudes of topics we can discuss, all are relevant to some degree, and they represent what individuals here want to discuss. If nobody wants to discuss the topic, then it goes away. If people want to discuss it, it stays current.

I felt that his post was arrogant, judgmental and self-righteous and I was trying to point that out. He asked for our opinions at the end of his post and I was giving him mine, in my own way.


BTW, Will -

I heard the Clinton document thing a few days ago and was fairly impressed by it. This is not the first time that Bush has gone out of his way to protect Clinton and I admire him for that. I would guess that it is one of the reasons why Clinton isn't overly critical of Bush....I think Clinton feels like he owes him a bit.

Plus, it shows that Bush can, at times, put himself above the political games often played. He could've handed over a lot of info that would've made Clinton look bad--but he didn't--and nobody would've criticized Bush if he had. You'll notice that Bush often publically speaks very highly of Clinton and has always treated him with more respect than most conservatives would be willing to give Clinton.

I think a lot of good things about Bush are often overlooked, just as many of the good things about Clinton were/are overlooked by Republicans.

__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.