|
I am still working on an opinion on this one. While I am familiar with the case (naturally) and the bombing. I am not up to speed on what when wrong.
I am dismayed at the amount of money spent and they either a) still don't know who did this or b) know who did it but couldn't get the case built against them...
In general I would say that I fall in with the lot of you who suggest, if they didn't have the evidence they shouldn't be convicted.
I'd rather they spend more money trying to get a conviction rather an spend it on another inquiry.
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
|