Quote:
Originally Posted by Manuel Hong
Recently (post 9/11), most large protests have been cordoned off into so-called "protest cages"
|
Before I start into this, I want to say that I also disagree vehemently with the so-called "Protest-Zones." They are an egregious violation of our first amendment rights to peaceably assemble & protest.
But these zones are NOT exclusively a post-9/11 thing, and not exclusively a George Bush/Republican thing.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/081600-105.htm
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/allpo.../protests.html
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/chld02.shtml
http://www.vh1.com/artists/news/1436...000/cher.jhtml
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=11796
(note the quote: "Elend encountered his first zones at the 2000
Democratic Convention in Los Angeles.")
And I'm also worried about this new type of "non-lethal" technology being used against the citizenry. Look at the recent death due to Pepper-Balls after the Boston Red Sox won the ALCS against the Yankees. The girl that was killed was a bystander, not in the fracas. She shouldn't have BEEN there, but what happens if the mob finds YOU?
One thing I really want to know about the weapon portrayed in the article is: can it be spread over a wide group? If so, I'm VERY scared.