|
I think sexuality is mostly a result of personal preference, influenced in a great part by the circumstances that the sexual person finds themselves in. A sexual person who engages in prison sex for the release/companionship and then when back to the outside world engages in exclusively heterosexual relationships - that person would be bi or gay only because of circumstance. The key phrase I think would be being sexual in the context you find yourself, and if you find yourself in a pure stag or pure doe environment and (voluntarily) express your sexuality with the available people I'm not sure that any term other than circumstantial homosexuality would be proper.
Now a person who makes a bi or gay choice in an open choice environment is expressing more a preference then making a choice limited by circumstance and the desire for human contact.
When I see women with women I understand it because I like women so much that it is obvious to me why a woman would feel the same way. Guys on guys is just kinda creepy and wrong to me, but as long as homo males aren't being aggressive or uncool then let it be.
I wouldn't want to be part of an MMF because the olfactory cues would be wrong, the sounds and the sights would be a turn-off, and the close proximity of what an internal part of me would read as "competitor" would shut off the sex part and just leave me feeling f*ed up and aggressive.
The FFM scene - if a no pressure situation did arise and I could get through all the performance anxiety stuff - would be fun because it would be extended cuddle/foreplay with lots of visually exciting elements (key for a guy) and an occasional break for sex. Yum.
I don't know if I answered the original question, but then at least you have a bit more grist for the mill, eh?
__________________
And now to disengage the clutch of the forebrain ... 
I'm going with this - if you like artwork visit http://markfineart.ca
|