View Single Post
Old 02-24-2005, 11:36 PM   #20 (permalink)
k925
Tilted
 
Location: Inside an econobox
Psycho Dad, as this is your thread, I feel that I should apologize for my previous overly stereotypical and nearsighted sounding generalization. It was included in my post mostly to provide some comedic value and perhaps some sway toward to my argument, but in hindsight it was obviously not well executed.

I do maintain, however, that (especially in our materialistic society) lack of personal wealth might drive some people toward rash behavior.

A lack of education might cause some people to not think through other alternatives or possibilities in a complicated situation.

A lack of a good haircut (i.e. having a mullet) might cause some people to be self-conscious of their looks and feel the need to drive into some fast-moving flood wash. (That one was supposed to be funny.)

Of course I don't think poor or uneducated people are all dumb and have no common sense. Nor do I think rich and educated people are all smart and full of common sense. From experience, however, I have learned that one's environment and quality of life might have a reasonable effect his or her behavior and actions. This is common sense, is it not?

If you wish, please ignore that sentence in my previous post that I'm sorry I typed and comment on the other parts of the point I was attempting to make (which was that the law itself is stupid).


Anyway, back on topic,

Quote:
Originally Posted by pocon1
You have to know what you are personally capapble of doing.
So, pocon1, let's say you were on your long hike and accidentally slipped on some mule dung, broke your leg, and consequently required a helicopter rescue. Since they warned you about exactly that, would that make you stupid?

I don't think it would, but you'd still be charged with the rescue in addition to the fine from the "stupid people" ticket if that law were to apply to hikers as well as motorists.

The fact that the law only applies to the drivers trying to cross the washes is still needless since other charges could already apply (as I was trying to say before). If something like this were to branch out to other forms of "stupid" behavior, not only would lawsuits fly, but it would make the time I wasted on this post look like a black spec in a vast desert of white sand when compared with the wasted time and resources used to fight this unnecessary law.
__________________
I can has furburger?
k925 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360