Originally Posted by oktjabr

I'm very sceptical that they would take the risk to piss off USA just to get rid of some silly opposition figure, considering the latest record of interventions US has... then again they of course might be counting on that USA has no army to make any interventions in a while. I'm not saying that they didn't do it, but considering that the region is full of different islamist extremist groups that feel no love for Hariri, I think that directly blaming (without any proof) Syria is jumping into conclusions. Or maybe this is one of those "Iraq has Al-Qaeda-ties"-thing?

Originally Posted by Christine Stewart, Former Minister of the Environment of Canada

"No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world."