View Single Post
Old 02-05-2005, 12:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
guthmund
big damn hero
 
guthmund's Avatar
 
It's a two fold problem.

The American media shys away from it. I mean, even when politicos were mentioning it during the beginnings of the war in Iraq, the news media largely ignored it. Sadly, if the news media, however pathetic its current incarnation, doesn't cover it, then the vast majority doesn't hear and doesn't care about it.

Second, the numbers are just so staggering. It's a question of relativity. You estimated 400,000 gone in the Sudan. That's a hard number to get a hold of. 3 people dead, you know 3 people, what if they died? 10 people dead, likewise. But 400,000? It's hard for folks who have seen the pictures to imagine 400,000 dead and nearly impossible to understand if you haven't.

Sadly, there isn't much 'we' can do other than get the information out. This isn't a problem to be solved by holding rallies, paying membership dues and mailing $30 a month to save a starving child. It's a problem, so large in scope, that our government must be the acting authority. It's not in our government's best interest to become involved with an internal civil war in Africa. At least, that's the official line. The fact of the matter is, it doesn't matter that they're 'africans,' what matters is they're poor and their countries have nothing to offer. Where's the incentive to jump headfirst into another Rwanda? What could those 400,000 possibly have had to barter with? They had nothing, which means any movement from our government has to be altruistic in nature. I bet you can count on both your hands how many times that's happened.

My heart goes out to them, it really does and those that care, do what they can. Sometimes you just can't make a person see past their own nose.

By the way. If you want a wide and varying response (or any more at all), I'd ask a moderator to move this to the politics forum. In the politics forum, everyone seems to have a differing opinion on everything and there are never any 'dry spells.'
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
guthmund is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360