Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Ok, I can understand, even accept, that.. except it seems that people (not you specifically) have this irritating habit of blindly accepting 'official' government statements with no factual documenation attributed to it and will declare all else B.S. or 'liberally' slanted because it doesn't 'fit' their ideological view.
|
There comes a point where you have to trust someone. In this case I have no reason to trust or distrust, they are an unknown. In that case I have to use my logic to decide if it makes sense. Now we know how fast both parties wish to blame the other for terrorists attacks, and how no one wants to take the blame for it. This article would require both parties to cover up, which just doesn't flow with how they operate. Since most of this happened under Clinton, you would think the Republicans would have been happy to place blame. Instead they would have helped cover it up. Plus there is the motive factor I mentioned before. As such I do not discount the possibility of truth, but I give the government the benefit of the doubt.