I tried to get worked up about this. I re-read it, I thought real hard about it and...well, nothing.
All I can say to the folks who are upset about this is that's apparently how it works. In this case, the rules have been laid. Unless you pick up and physically take command of the paper, you have to work inside the confines of the system because counter protesting doesn't seem to cut it.
Storm the offices and physically throw the "editors" from their chairs or use the system to replace the "editors" in their chairs.
Or of course.....you could just not read it at all.
There's always going to be a niche for things like this, public dime or no, but the only thing their doing right now is drawing attention to it. In this case, isn't that counter-productive? How many people have read this? How many people are now trying to get their hands on it? How is this hurting the paper?
I'm all for demonstration, believe me, but sometimes you have to put down the sign and start looking for practical ways to get the job done.
__________________
No signature. None. Seriously.
|