Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarl Cabot
While I think that for the most part, you are correct, I also think that there are more exceptions to the above than you may be aware of.
There was just an article in my local paper (do they have "sweeps weeks?") regarding strippers and prostitutes. These days, there are so many internet ads for "escorts" that pimps or whatever are not as ubiquitous as in prior years. Simply put, the working girls don't need them as much.
I also had difficulty seeing a direct connection between legalization and the slave trade.
Yes, as you said, prostitution is linked to the slave trade, but I don't see legalization changing that for better or worse.
|
Bluntly, I'm not interested in the exceptions--I'm interested in the regular victims of prostitution.
Also, those escort ads you are referring to--those are the ones I'm referring to that are brought over from Russia and Asia and forced into sex as an occupation to pay for their smuggling costs (HINT: they never manage to pay those debts off).
The "working girls" as you put it are sex slaves within very organized crime syndicates.
I'm hoping a LEO stumbles across this and can provide more information on how anti-prostitution sweeps help them get to the heart of the matter. The Law & Order episodes of junkies turning to sex are appalling in their own right, but the focus and energy is on the organized crime racket--not the local stripper going home with her favorite patron (which also apparently happens less frequently than people would like to believe--and I use like intentionally because somehow stripping and hooking turn out to be powerful male fantasies, but not particularly grounded in reality).