View Single Post
Old 10-29-2004, 09:32 AM   #38 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
so this has drifted from baseball players as political agents to "celebrities"--musicians in particular--a topic that has republicans have been whining forever it seems--maybe because the only musicians they seem to be able to atract are mainstream country players, and frankly i doubt even most of them want to have to listen to that.

there is a huge difference between the level of articulateness about politics you might expect from a musician and what you would expect from a baseball player. nothing personal, but the mediums are very different. in my experience, music is almost always at some level about politics, but about the politics of this particular culture, about the choices that structure it.


to back up---popular music is not one thing.
if you are not inclined to listen, it is not surprising that you will not hear anything--my father, for example, was a devoted beethoven and haydn fan--i played some webern piano music for him once, and he thought it sounded like a cat walking a piano.
this reaction said nothing about webern--all it spoke to was what my father was accustomed to and what happens when a piece of music violates the implicit rules.

that said, there are some quite complex, quite formidable music that gets lumped into the category "popular"---and some extraordinarily articulate folk involved with making it.

there are of course more and a few cretins, an more than enough stupid, obvious, simple-minded stuff as well--but anyone who has ears can distinguish them.

all i will say is that you might find more musicians were supportive of the existing order if the existing system of cultural production was not as it is---if there was, for example, more funding for the arts in general---if there was a context more generally in which doing music does not in itself seem to constitute an oppostional act--if the american reliance on commercial channels was not generative of such odious results, both at the level of process and product. were successful musicians not expected to tour as copies of their recordings. were success not as much a trap as a benefit in this area. the list goes on and on.


you reap what you sow.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360