Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
Of course the SB is the goal of all teams, but your argument was that Brady is better than Pennington because he was an SB MVP.
EDIT: Take a look at the numbers, they don't lie.
|
Okay, so let's look at the honest numbers:
2004
Brady: 95.3 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 11-5
Pennington: 94.4 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 5-2
2003
Brady: 85.9 and 23-12
Pennington: 82.9 and 13-12
2002
Brady: 85.7 and 28-14
Pennington: 104.2 and 22-6
So, yes, Pennington has been the better QB in one of the last three years statistically. If you want to really dulge into things, Brady also hasn't had a solid running back until this year. Chad has had Martin for all three years.
I'd take Brady and his lesser quarterback skills any day of the week over Pennington, McNair or even Peyton.