Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Interests > Tilted Sports


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2004, 12:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Pats vs Jets

Will the streak continue? My roommate says hell yes. go fins.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 10-22-2004 at 12:46 PM.. Reason: removed: Personally I think the pats are a bunch of friggin homos but the jets aren't any better.
stevo is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 12:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
You want to rephrase that, or should I just cut to the chase and throw insults as well?
Redlemon is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 12:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
My money is on the Jets. Personally I think the patsies are an over rated and extremely lucky team. How many games have they won by a last second field goal? I will give them credit though in the fact that they play and work as a team...something I can't say about my team. This is why they win, they don't have any all star players, they just have good chemistry.

P.S I hate Brady.
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 01:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
It's all downhill from here
 
docbungle's Avatar
 
Location: Denver
I predict jets crashing and eating turf.
__________________
Bad Luck City
docbungle is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 01:27 PM   #5 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
The line is 6.5 in favor of the Patriots, which I think is high. Nonetheless, I'm expecting a Patriots win.

Who do you will think will have a better running day, Curtis Martin or Corey Dillon? That should be interesting to watch.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 02:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlemon
You want to rephrase that, or should I just cut to the chase and throw insults as well?
I apologize for the way I phrased my post. I wasn't trying to insult anyone; only stir up some contraversy before the game. If I offended you, I am sorry. I admit I'm jealous of both teams records, and only wish it were the same for my team. I will be more thoughtful in my posts from now on.
stevo is offline  
Old 10-22-2004, 11:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
My money is on the Jets. Personally I think the patsies are an over rated and extremely lucky team. How many games have they won by a last second field goal? I will give them credit though in the fact that they play and work as a team...something I can't say about my team. This is why they win, they don't have any all star players, they just have good chemistry.

P.S I hate Brady.
I agree 100% with everything you said.... they win because they always play hard and they play in the parity era. The 90's Cowboys, 80's 49ers, 70's steelers, etc.. would all blow them away (not just my opinion; steve young et al expressed the same on a pregame show).

I think the Jets have a good shot to upset them - they are coming in on a roll, and have the motivation of being the underdogs to motivate them. Plus, the Pats D-line isn't real strong this year, aside from Seymour, and Curtis Martin is playing amazing football so far... I look for the Jets to control the ball, control the clock, limit mistakes, and beat the patriots at their own game. Penington is a good QB for a game like this - accurate and few INTs for the opportunistic NE defense....

PS - I'm still disappointed Jenkins didn't smash Brady in last year's superbowl
aerozeppelin is offline  
Old 10-23-2004, 07:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Addict
 
Location: NoVA
Can we have them both lose? Ugh go Jets.
wrongfullyaccuzd is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
Upright
 
Location: 2 Blocks from the Beach, California
Don't see the Jets winning. I'd love to see an upset--I guess its not as crazy as the Dolphins winning, eh?
CheesePizzaMan is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:57 AM   #10 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheesePizzaMan
Don't see the Jets winning. I'd love to see an upset--I guess its not as crazy as the Dolphins winning, eh?
No, not half as crazy, and not a fourth as painful. I can't believe the Rams got blown out like that....
aerozeppelin is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerozeppelin
I agree 100% with everything you said.... they win because they always play hard and they play in the parity era. The 90's Cowboys, 80's 49ers, 70's steelers, etc.. would all blow them away (not just my opinion; steve young et al expressed the same on a pregame show).

I think the Jets have a good shot to upset them - they are coming in on a roll, and have the motivation of being the underdogs to motivate them. Plus, the Pats D-line isn't real strong this year, aside from Seymour, and Curtis Martin is playing amazing football so far... I look for the Jets to control the ball, control the clock, limit mistakes, and beat the patriots at their own game. Penington is a good QB for a game like this - accurate and few INTs for the opportunistic NE defense....

PS - I'm still disappointed Jenkins didn't smash Brady in last year's superbowl
Hindsight being 20/20 and all, but the Pats are a complete football team. They avoid mistakes, they play solid on both sides of the ball, and they just win. If 21 in a row isn't enough, how about beating two true contenders in back to back weeks? How about beating Indy? How about winning a Super Bowl?

Again in retrospect, aren't the Jets just a watered down version of NE? Good QBs just coming into their prime, with a veteran backs? Both of them have that, but the Jets don't match up favorably on defense.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 11:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scipio
Hindsight being 20/20 and all, but the Pats are a complete football team. They avoid mistakes, they play solid on both sides of the ball, and they just win. If 21 in a row isn't enough, how about beating two true contenders in back to back weeks? How about beating Indy? How about winning a Super Bowl?

Again in retrospect, aren't the Jets just a watered down version of NE? Good QBs just coming into their prime, with a veteran backs? Both of them have that, but the Jets don't match up favorably on defense.
I concede that they are complete, play balanced football, and avoid mistakes. I just don't htink they are dominant the way older dynasties were. I don't know if I'd classify the Jets as a real contender, but I was very impressed by the way they smashed the Hawks. The Indy victory seemed somewhat lucky to me - that was one of the few times I've seen manning make a mistke by just backing up and letting McGinest sack him senseless - but was a W nonetheless. I personally think that Manning will one day just smash them when he figures out what coverage Belicheck is using against him and can put his offensive genius (I think hes better than most o-coordinaters) to use. I give belicheck credit for mixing it up enough that Manning never gets a full feel for the NE D, though. I think Jacksonville could give them a good match, though, given the matchups - NE isn't great against the run and Jacksonville can run right at those LB's with Taylor and wear them down. Plus, I like Stroud et al against NE's line, though I think Brady could have success against their secondary if they give him even a little time.

The Jets don't seem that much like NE to me, because I think they have a big play threat in Santana Moss that NE doesn't have, and also because, as you mentioned, the NE D is significantly better and much more opportunistic than the Jets D.
aerozeppelin is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 05:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
Curious
 
Shpoop's Avatar
 
Location: NJ (but just for college)
and i dont think the quarterbacks really compare all that much either.

brady sucks, and pennington is good


ok ok...brady throws short balls and screens all the time, and lets the receivers do the work, but pennington has more of a long ball....if that makes any sense
Shpoop is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 05:47 AM   #14 (permalink)
Sleepy Head
 
dylanmarsh's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shpoop
and i dont think the quarterbacks really compare all that much either.
brady sucks, and pennington is good

Remind me again who the MVP was of the 2001 and 2003 Super Bowls. I can't seem to remember. Was it Pennington?
dylanmarsh is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 07:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo22
I apologize for the way I phrased my post. I wasn't trying to insult anyone; only stir up some contraversy before the game. If I offended you, I am sorry. I admit I'm jealous of both teams records, and only wish it were the same for my team. I will be more thoughtful in my posts from now on.
Thanks for stepping up. I wasn't offended, just trying to bring the level of dialog up.
Redlemon is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 07:44 AM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
I"m completely pissed at Time Warner. I'm in NC which is on the EAST COAST. They had me on fucking West Coast coverage all day so I missed the game. Gee thanx for nothing cable company.

anyway I saw that the pats won. It wasn't that big of a surprise. The Jets had some injuries so that didn't help their cause at all. The Pats just know how to win.
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 08:13 AM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
MVP of the SB, not the season, big deal. Brady still sucks.

EDIT: Actually, you know what, I wont say he flat out sucks. But he is not good either, extremely over rated. If it wasn't for his line, he would throw like my man Collins . He already has 43 INT's in his short career.

Last edited by Rdr4evr; 10-25-2004 at 08:17 AM..
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 08:21 AM   #18 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: here and there
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
MVP of the SB, not the season, big deal. Brady still sucks.

EDIT: Actually, you know what, I wont say he flat out sucks. But he is not good either, extremely over rated. If it wasn't for his line, he would throw like my man Collins . He already has 43 INT's in his short career.
and two superbowl rings to go along with them.
__________________
# chmod 111 /bin/Laden
theFez is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 08:33 AM   #19 (permalink)
Sleepy Head
 
dylanmarsh's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
MVP of the SB, not the season, big deal.
You know what, you're right. Being the MVP of the regular season means so much more to guys like Peyton Manning and Steve McNair than actually winning the Super Bowl that they allow Brady to beat them every year and give him the lesser award. Give me a break.
dylanmarsh is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 08:54 AM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
Of course the SB is the goal of all teams, but your argument was that Brady is better than Pennington because he was an SB MVP. That does not make him better in the least, sure he has two rings, but Manning, McNair and Pennington still blow him out of the water. The problems the others have or have had is not having the whole team, which Brady does. Was Johnson better than Gannon in 02 because he got the ring? No, his defense was though.

EDIT: Take a look at the numbers, they don't lie.

Last edited by Rdr4evr; 10-25-2004 at 09:07 AM..
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 09:44 AM   #21 (permalink)
Sleepy Head
 
dylanmarsh's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
Of course the SB is the goal of all teams, but your argument was that Brady is better than Pennington because he was an SB MVP.

EDIT: Take a look at the numbers, they don't lie.
Okay, so let's look at the honest numbers:

2004

Brady: 95.3 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 11-5

Pennington: 94.4 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 5-2

2003

Brady: 85.9 and 23-12

Pennington: 82.9 and 13-12

2002

Brady: 85.7 and 28-14

Pennington: 104.2 and 22-6

So, yes, Pennington has been the better QB in one of the last three years statistically. If you want to really dulge into things, Brady also hasn't had a solid running back until this year. Chad has had Martin for all three years.

I'd take Brady and his lesser quarterback skills any day of the week over Pennington, McNair or even Peyton.
dylanmarsh is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 09:50 AM   #22 (permalink)
Psycho
 
crossova's Avatar
 
Location: new york
my brother is a die hard Pat fan so he is just gloating every wknd.

Jets couldve won it...why throw to a wideout doing a post rout...all he had to do was dump it to his right....there was another reciever doin a button hook.
crossova is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 10:13 AM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
Rdr4evr's Avatar
 
Att / Comp PCT. Yards TD / INT Rating

1716 1059 61.7 11622 80 43 86.8 Brady

903 602 66.7 6731 42 20 95.0 Pennigton

Those are the TOTAL numbers by the way. Don't make me bring Mannings numbers in here to compare to Tommy boy now .
Rdr4evr is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 10:16 AM   #24 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
I'd take Brady and his lesser quarterback skills any day of the week over Pennington, McNair or even Peyton.
Thanks for the numbers, but not Manning. Nobody would put Brady, as solid as he is, ahead of Manning.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/4256/career

Manning - last year

99 QBR, 67% complete, 4267 yards (266 per game), 29 TDs, 10 INTs

This year, so far

116 QBR, 66.8% complete, 1689 yards (281 per game), 17 TDs, 3 INTs

Godly numbers, if you ask me.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 10:20 AM   #25 (permalink)
Crazy
 
I love the Penneington vs. Brady comparisons. So is this a statistical battle or is it about getting the big W. Brady seems to have quite a few more of those, same goes for Brady vs. Manning. Didn't Al Davis say; "just win baby"!!!!
runtuff is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 10:34 AM   #26 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdr4evr
Att / Comp PCT. Yards TD / INT Rating

1716 1059 61.7 11622 80 43 86.8 Brady

903 602 66.7 6731 42 20 95.0 Pennigton

Those are the TOTAL numbers by the way. Don't make me bring Mannings numbers in here to compare to Tommy boy now .


those numbers are decieving due to the huge difference in attempts and completions..

that being said I'm a phins fan and I'll shutup now
Glory's Sun is offline  
Old 10-25-2004, 02:30 PM   #27 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by runtuff
I love the Penneington vs. Brady comparisons. So is this a statistical battle or is it about getting the big W. Brady seems to have quite a few more of those, same goes for Brady vs. Manning. Didn't Al Davis say; "just win baby"!!!!
If you give Manning the NE D, he would probably go 16-0 if only beacuse no other defense has a coaching staff smart enough to seriously confuse him. Manning isn't lacking in the W category either..... and he's given the Patriots a lot of very close calls. A little luck for Indy (just a few bounces here and there) and they'll beat NE. I still think its Indy going to the SB for the AFC.
aerozeppelin is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 06:12 AM   #28 (permalink)
Devoted
 
Redlemon's Avatar
 
Donor
Location: New England
Quote:
Originally Posted by redlemon
Who do you will think will have a better running day, Curtis Martin or Corey Dillon? That should be interesting to watch.
To answer myself:
Martin (NYJ) 20/70
Dillon (NE) 22/115
Redlemon is offline  
 

Tags
jets, pats


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360