10-22-2004, 12:44 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Banned
|
My money is on the Jets. Personally I think the patsies are an over rated and extremely lucky team. How many games have they won by a last second field goal? I will give them credit though in the fact that they play and work as a team...something I can't say about my team. This is why they win, they don't have any all star players, they just have good chemistry.
P.S I hate Brady. |
10-22-2004, 01:27 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Devoted
Donor
Location: New England
|
The line is 6.5 in favor of the Patriots, which I think is high. Nonetheless, I'm expecting a Patriots win.
Who do you will think will have a better running day, Curtis Martin or Corey Dillon? That should be interesting to watch. |
10-22-2004, 02:25 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Rail Baron
Location: Tallyfla
|
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2004, 11:29 PM | #7 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
I think the Jets have a good shot to upset them - they are coming in on a roll, and have the motivation of being the underdogs to motivate them. Plus, the Pats D-line isn't real strong this year, aside from Seymour, and Curtis Martin is playing amazing football so far... I look for the Jets to control the ball, control the clock, limit mistakes, and beat the patriots at their own game. Penington is a good QB for a game like this - accurate and few INTs for the opportunistic NE defense.... PS - I'm still disappointed Jenkins didn't smash Brady in last year's superbowl |
|
10-24-2004, 11:27 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
Mencken
Location: College
|
Quote:
Again in retrospect, aren't the Jets just a watered down version of NE? Good QBs just coming into their prime, with a veteran backs? Both of them have that, but the Jets don't match up favorably on defense.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention." |
|
10-24-2004, 11:51 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
The Jets don't seem that much like NE to me, because I think they have a big play threat in Santana Moss that NE doesn't have, and also because, as you mentioned, the NE D is significantly better and much more opportunistic than the Jets D. |
|
10-25-2004, 05:19 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Curious
Location: NJ (but just for college)
|
and i dont think the quarterbacks really compare all that much either.
brady sucks, and pennington is good ok ok...brady throws short balls and screens all the time, and lets the receivers do the work, but pennington has more of a long ball....if that makes any sense |
10-25-2004, 05:47 AM | #14 (permalink) | |
Sleepy Head
|
Quote:
Remind me again who the MVP was of the 2001 and 2003 Super Bowls. I can't seem to remember. Was it Pennington? |
|
10-25-2004, 07:41 AM | #15 (permalink) | |
Devoted
Donor
Location: New England
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2004, 07:44 AM | #16 (permalink) |
Registered User
|
I"m completely pissed at Time Warner. I'm in NC which is on the EAST COAST. They had me on fucking West Coast coverage all day so I missed the game. Gee thanx for nothing cable company.
anyway I saw that the pats won. It wasn't that big of a surprise. The Jets had some injuries so that didn't help their cause at all. The Pats just know how to win. |
10-25-2004, 08:13 AM | #17 (permalink) |
Banned
|
MVP of the SB, not the season, big deal. Brady still sucks.
EDIT: Actually, you know what, I wont say he flat out sucks. But he is not good either, extremely over rated. If it wasn't for his line, he would throw like my man Collins . He already has 43 INT's in his short career. Last edited by Rdr4evr; 10-25-2004 at 08:17 AM.. |
10-25-2004, 08:21 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Crazy
Location: here and there
|
Quote:
__________________
# chmod 111 /bin/Laden |
|
10-25-2004, 08:33 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
Sleepy Head
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2004, 08:54 AM | #20 (permalink) |
Banned
|
Of course the SB is the goal of all teams, but your argument was that Brady is better than Pennington because he was an SB MVP. That does not make him better in the least, sure he has two rings, but Manning, McNair and Pennington still blow him out of the water. The problems the others have or have had is not having the whole team, which Brady does. Was Johnson better than Gannon in 02 because he got the ring? No, his defense was though.
EDIT: Take a look at the numbers, they don't lie. Last edited by Rdr4evr; 10-25-2004 at 09:07 AM.. |
10-25-2004, 09:44 AM | #21 (permalink) | |
Sleepy Head
|
Quote:
2004 Brady: 95.3 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 11-5 Pennington: 94.4 Quarterback Rating and a TD-INT ratio of 5-2 2003 Brady: 85.9 and 23-12 Pennington: 82.9 and 13-12 2002 Brady: 85.7 and 28-14 Pennington: 104.2 and 22-6 So, yes, Pennington has been the better QB in one of the last three years statistically. If you want to really dulge into things, Brady also hasn't had a solid running back until this year. Chad has had Martin for all three years. I'd take Brady and his lesser quarterback skills any day of the week over Pennington, McNair or even Peyton. |
|
10-25-2004, 10:16 AM | #24 (permalink) | |
Mencken
Location: College
|
Quote:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/4256/career Manning - last year 99 QBR, 67% complete, 4267 yards (266 per game), 29 TDs, 10 INTs This year, so far 116 QBR, 66.8% complete, 1689 yards (281 per game), 17 TDs, 3 INTs Godly numbers, if you ask me.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention." |
|
10-25-2004, 10:34 AM | #26 (permalink) | |
Registered User
|
Quote:
those numbers are decieving due to the huge difference in attempts and completions.. that being said I'm a phins fan and I'll shutup now |
|
10-25-2004, 02:30 PM | #27 (permalink) | |
Tilted
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
jets, pats |
|
|