|
i know, asaris--that is why i framed what i wrote as being about the characterization of sartre, not about sartre. but i found the characteriztion interesting enough to comment on. i am not sure where the characterization is situated with reference to sartre's work--there are a number of phases to it, with differing formulations of basic questions. it sounds like the thread is oriented around earlier work, but i am not sure. knowing this would help, actually.
and i still do not understand what is meant by "reactive" in the nietzsche argument.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|