I still don't see a problem of one book covering it from a biblical perspective out of I'm sure tons covering the science. I think that going out of one's way to block a biblical perspective is not separation of church and state as its fighting against biblical views, separation should be a nuetral stance. If someone rights Crack in the Mother Earth: The Wiccan Tale of the Grand Canyon then by all means throw that up there too. The peopel buying the book are going to be Christian or people what would be curious about alternate views anyway. This book really isn't ministry or preaching. It really wasn't harming anyone.
The same with the 10 commandments in the court room. What is so offensive about 10 commonly held values. I mean if there was a few proverbs from the orient up there are they going to castrate the judge for the mystical practices surrounding the finding of zen which they come from. You have to draw the line somewhere between separation and insanity.
|