View Single Post
Old 10-15-2004, 02:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Will the "Seperation of Church and State" premise, survive if Bush is elected?

More and more, I fear for the future of my country, since it appears to
now be under the political control of religious fundamentalists; not much
different in their level of close minded, anti-scientific, bigotted, fundamentalist zealotry than what was observed in the Islamic revolution
that took place in Iran in 1979. Science, tolerance, and common sense are
concepts that are losing ground in this battle.
Quote:
<p>Press Release</p>
<p>For Immediate Release: Wednesday, October 13, 2004<br>
Contact: Chas Offutt (202) 265-7337</p>

<p align="center"> <font color="#000000"><strong>PARK SERVICE STICKS
WITH BIBLICAL EXPLANATION FOR GRAND CANYON<br>
Promised Legal Review on Creationist Book Is Shelved</strong></font></p>
<p> Washington, DC — The Bush Administration has decided that
it will stand by its approval for a book claiming the Grand Canyon
was created by Noah’s flood rather than by geologic forces,
according to internal documents released today by Public Employees
for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).</p>
<p>Despite telling members of Congress and the public that the legality
and appropriateness of the National Park Service offering a creationist
book for sale at Grand Canyon museums and bookstores was “under
review at the national level by several offices,” no such review
took place, according to materials obtained by PEER under the Freedom
of Information Act. Instead, the real agency position was expressed
by NPS spokesperson Elaine Sevy as quoted in the Baptist Press News:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>“Now that the book has become quite popular, we don’t
want to remove it.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In August of 2003, Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent Joe
Alston attempted to block the sale of Grand Canyon: A Different View,
by Tom Vail, a book explaining how the park’s central feature
developed on a biblical rather than an evolutionary time scale. NPS
Headquarters, however, intervened and overruled Alston. To quiet the
resulting furor, NPS Chief of Communications David Barna told reporters
that there would be a high-level policy review, distributing talking
points stating: “We hope to have a final decision in February
[2004].” In fact, the promised review never occurred –</p>
<ul>

<li> In late February, Barna crafted a draft letter to concerned members
of Congress stating: “We hope to have a final decision on
the book in March 2004.” That draft was rewritten in June
and finally sent out to Congressional representatives with no completion
date for the review at all;</li>
<li> NPS Headquarters did not respond to a January 25th memo from
its own top geologists charging that sale of the book violated agency
policies and undercut its scientific education programs;</li>
<li> The Park Service ignored a letter of protest signed by the presidents
of seven scientific societies on December 16, 2003.</li>
</ul>

<p>“Promoting creationism in our national parks is just as wrong
as promoting it in our public schools,” stated PEER Executive
Director Jeff Ruch, “If the Bush Administration is using public
resources for pandering to Christian fundamentalists, it should at
least have the decency to tell the truth about it.”</p>
<p>The creationist book is not the only religious controversy at Grand
Canyon National Park. One week prior to the approved sale of Grand
Canyon: A Different View, NPS Deputy Director Donald Murphy ordered
that bronze plaques bearing Psalm verses be returned and reinstalled
at canyon overlooks. Superintendent Alston had removed the bronze
plaques on legal advice from Interior Department solicitors. Murphy
also wrote a letter of apology to the plaques’ sponsors, the
Evangelical Sisterhood of Mary. PEER has collected other instances
of what it calls the Bush Administration’s “Faith-Based
Parks” agenda.</p> <a href="http://www.peer.org/press/524.html">http://www.peer.org/press/524.html</a>
Background on this can be viewed here:
<a href="http://www.freeinquiry.com/skeptic/badgeology/grandcanyon/controversy.htm">http://www.freeinquiry.com/skeptic/badgeology/grandcanyon/controversy.htm</a>
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360