Thread: AMD vs. Intel
View Single Post
Old 07-11-2004, 07:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Lasereth
Knight of the Old Republic
 
Lasereth's Avatar
 
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisJericho
The intels processors are generally better for media/video editing while the AMD'S are usually better for gaming.

The Prescott's do not offer much more of a performance increase over the northwood's and they usually run hotter.
Jericho's right! If you are gonna go with Intel, getting a Prescott won't get you much more power, but they're not that much more money nowadays. It really depends on what ya wanna do with the processor. There's not much of a reason to spend the extra money with Intel unless you're positively gonna do video editing or media creation. The extra clock speed that comes with Intel's processors will give a big advantage on AMD processors with media applications.

If you're buying this processor for gaming, AMD is the way to go. AMD's processors are cheaper (as in less money) and are basically designed for gaming.

The options after that are simply about upgradeability. Socket 754 might not last much longer with AMD. They're really enjoying supporting socket 939 now. Socket 940 is already dead! Socket A will see a lot more life in the future (AMD is releasing new socket A processors to "combat" Intel's Celeron D series). I'd go with Socket A or Socket 939. Socket 754 wouldn't be a bad decision (if you did buy a socket 754 processors, chances are it won't be outdated for a few years...even if AMD discontinues it, your processor will still kick ass!). Anything but socket 940!

Now, the best bang-for-your-buck is easily the AMD Athlon XP 2500+ and onward. The 2500+ is only $80! Athlon XPs are still great processors and will last for a good while in the gaming industry. As of now, videocards are the major determining factor in how well games run. Another great deal is the Athlon 64 3200+ (socket 754).

If you're hell-bent on spending a ton of money on a processor, I'd choose the Athlon 64 3500+. Even though it's pretty damn expensive (not much more than the processor you listed though), you're getting the power of an Athlon 64 plus a motherboard with socket 939. Socket 939 is AMD's flagship socket, so you're good to go with upgradeability for a few years. Another option would be the 3.4 GHz Prescott you listed. I'd only get that if you're gonna go crazy with media creation though!

-Lasereth
__________________
"A Darwinian attacks his theory, seeking to find flaws. An ID believer defends his theory, seeking to conceal flaws." -Roger Ebert
Lasereth is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360