|
if you are postulating a "god" then don't you have to assume his behaviour is either rational or "super-rational" ?
i.e. assuming that you can understand how God thinks might be a waste of time ... he's GOD for goodness sake
(this in some ways echos the arguments that God must exist because we can conceive of a god ... St Anselm was it? anyway, one attribute of perfection was existance... which admittedly I don't go for logically speaking)
__________________
pain is inevitable but misery is optional - stick a geranium in your hat and be happy
|