View Single Post
Old 07-06-2004, 02:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
OFKU0
Junk
 
Nuclear watchdog starts visit to Israel

http://sympatico.msn.cbc.ca/story/ne...ear040706.html

Quote:
Nuclear watchdog starts visit to Israel
Last Updated Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:59:54 EDT

JERUSALEM - The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency began a visit to Israel Tuesday, pushing its political leaders to accept the concept of a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.

Israel has never admitted to having nuclear weapons, but experts believe it has produced up to 200 nuclear warheads over the years.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has already made his feelings clear about IAEA director general Mohamed elBaradei's visit.

He told Israeli radio on Tuesday morning that he wasn't sure what the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog was coming to see, adding that Israel has no intention of changing its nuclear strategy.

Officials from the Atomic Energy Commission say elBaradei still hopes to present his arguments in talks with Sharon and other senior political figures.

"That's a big chore, but what Dr. elBaradei is trying to achieve is for the states of the Middle East to begin serious strategic discussions," said spokesman Mark Gwozeky.

Israel is renowned for its policy of "strategic ambiguity." It doesn't admit to or deny having nuclear weapons and it hasn't signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. That means it is not obliged to declare its nuclear activities to UN inspectors.

A number of Israeli analysts say it would be unwise for Israel to sign the treaty, saying the country has too many enemies in the Middle East to disarm its weapons.

Israel has also accused Iran of trying to make nuclear weapons.


Do you think Israel should comply or not? If not, are there any reasons why they shouldn't, barring their mainstream opinion that they will be pushed into the sea? Would complying show an effort toward peace in the mideast?

It strikes me as odd and incredibly one sided that if Israel have nuclear weapons, they are essential responsible to no one for them. And not having to sign a non-proliferation treaty if they have weapons is ludicrous. This is unbelievable. And Iraq was at the top of the list as the most imminent threat to the world? What are your thought?

*edit: added quotes for readability*
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.

Last edited by Peetster; 07-07-2004 at 03:16 AM..
OFKU0 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360