Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2004, 02:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Junk
 
Nuclear watchdog starts visit to Israel

http://sympatico.msn.cbc.ca/story/ne...ear040706.html

Quote:
Nuclear watchdog starts visit to Israel
Last Updated Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:59:54 EDT

JERUSALEM - The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency began a visit to Israel Tuesday, pushing its political leaders to accept the concept of a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.

Israel has never admitted to having nuclear weapons, but experts believe it has produced up to 200 nuclear warheads over the years.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has already made his feelings clear about IAEA director general Mohamed elBaradei's visit.

He told Israeli radio on Tuesday morning that he wasn't sure what the head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog was coming to see, adding that Israel has no intention of changing its nuclear strategy.

Officials from the Atomic Energy Commission say elBaradei still hopes to present his arguments in talks with Sharon and other senior political figures.

"That's a big chore, but what Dr. elBaradei is trying to achieve is for the states of the Middle East to begin serious strategic discussions," said spokesman Mark Gwozeky.

Israel is renowned for its policy of "strategic ambiguity." It doesn't admit to or deny having nuclear weapons and it hasn't signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. That means it is not obliged to declare its nuclear activities to UN inspectors.

A number of Israeli analysts say it would be unwise for Israel to sign the treaty, saying the country has too many enemies in the Middle East to disarm its weapons.

Israel has also accused Iran of trying to make nuclear weapons.


Do you think Israel should comply or not? If not, are there any reasons why they shouldn't, barring their mainstream opinion that they will be pushed into the sea? Would complying show an effort toward peace in the mideast?

It strikes me as odd and incredibly one sided that if Israel have nuclear weapons, they are essential responsible to no one for them. And not having to sign a non-proliferation treaty if they have weapons is ludicrous. This is unbelievable. And Iraq was at the top of the list as the most imminent threat to the world? What are your thought?

*edit: added quotes for readability*
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.

Last edited by Peetster; 07-07-2004 at 03:16 AM..
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 03:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
 
archer2371's Avatar
 
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
What happened to:

"Nuclear weapons? What nuclear weapons????" *shifty eyes*

Anyways, I think that a nuclear free Middle-East is a rather noble goal. However, unless the IAEA can guarantee the disarmament of other nations in the region, it's rather impractical.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"

"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."

"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."
archer2371 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 03:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pickles
 
ObieX's Avatar
 
Location: Shirt and Pants (NJ)
Didn't Israel already try to use a nuke in one of its pervious wars? The plane was either called off or crashed? Or is that just a rumor?
__________________
We Must Dissent.
ObieX is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 05:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
....is off his meds...you were warned.
 
KMA-628's Avatar
 
Location: The Wild Wild West
ObieX,

I was thinking the same thing. I thought it was common knowledge that Israel had nukes.
__________________
Before you criticize someone, you need to walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if they get angry at you.......you're a mile away.......and they're barefoot.
KMA-628 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 06:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
 
archer2371's Avatar
 
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
Everyone knows they have nukes, it's just funny to hear the official line of the government over there that categorically denies everything when it comes to that particular topic. And yes, they did have a plane with a nuke on it crash, that beginning to both the book and movie of "The Sum of All Fears" is no fictional conjuring.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"

"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."

"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."
archer2371 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 08:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Insane
 
assilem's Avatar
 
Location: Eternity
Israel (IMHO) only uses the nukes as a deterrent. They have been pretty responsible with them so far. If they did not have them (nukes) they would already have been a greasy spot in the dessert. Correct me if I am wrong, but did the U.S. not give them to the Israelis?
__________________
The mother of mankind, what time his pride
Had cast him out from Heaven, with all his host
Of rebel Angels
assilem is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 08:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by assilem
Israel (IMHO) only uses the nukes as a deterrent. They have been pretty responsible with them so far. If they did not have them (nukes) they would already have been a greasy spot in the dessert. Correct me if I am wrong, but did the U.S. not give them to the Israelis?
Actually, the French were the main supporters of Israeli nuclear technology. I think that Israel's possession of nukes has always been a source of irritation in Washington DC.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 08:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
Insane
 
assilem's Avatar
 
Location: Eternity
Quote:
Originally posted by cthulu23
Actually, the French were the main supporters of Israeli nuclear technology. I think that Israel's possession of nukes has always been a source of irritation in Washington DC.
I was wrong. Thanks for the clarification cthulu23. Why a source of irritation? I'm curious after reading an op/ed piece in Time today by Charlie Krauthammer. Link
__________________
The mother of mankind, what time his pride
Had cast him out from Heaven, with all his host
Of rebel Angels
assilem is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 09:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Tthe US government objects to most any nation's pursuit of nuclear weapons. I think that the US would prefer to be the "nuclear benefactor" in our relationships with our allies. During the cold war (and presently, as well), it was common practice for US nuclear weapons to be "stationed" in western European countries as a sort of doomsday by proxy. This way, we control the nukes but still gain whatever political advantage their is in annihilating ourselves a tad bit more quickly.

I know that the thought of nukes spreading across the globe is enough to make me lose sleep, particularly they seem to be moving towards global flashpoints, such as India and Pakistan or Israel.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 09:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Mencken
 
Scipio's Avatar
 
Location: College
Israel views nuclear weapons as an essential element of its defensive strategy. For decades, they've gotten away with having them, but not declaring them. As far as I'm concerned, it's high time they either declare them, or destroy them, just like every other decent democracy on the planet.
__________________
"Erections lasting more than 4 hours, though rare, require immediate medical attention."
Scipio is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 09:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
I'm all for Israel having Nukes. It's no secret that countries such as Iran and Iraq (read Osiriak) have actively in the past, or to this day, still seek to use nuclear weapons against the "evil zionists". I also say anyone who bitches that they should bow to the demands of the UN can piss off. If I were in the unique situation Israel was in, I would not give up my monopoly, nor sovereignty to a corrupt world body that is heavly against me.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 10:21 PM   #12 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Fünland
I can imagine how people in the arabic world feel betrayed when Israel is "allowed" to have WMDs (after all there are countless UN resolutions against them, but either they are ignored or voted down by US and Marshall Islands).

West: Ok now dear arab nations, destroy your WMD:s and stop developing them.
Arab nations: But daddy, daddy, why Israel is allowed to have them? We want them too!
West: Now, now - Israel is a special case.

And sure sure, world body is always corrupted if it has a wrong opinion.

Jokes aside, is it really that countries that are surrounded by enemies can have nuclear weapons? Or does that rule apply only when the west is allied with them?
__________________
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -- forever."
-G.O.
oktjabr is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 10:38 PM   #13 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
It applies when Israel has a responsibility to its' sovereign. Israel has a major deterrence against the Arabs who don't make it an issue to hide their hatred for Israel. The state of Israel only has a responsibility to protect its people, not to please a bunch of anti-semites.

And I'll stand by it, what treaty is Israel bound too? What law makes it now acceptable for them to have Nukes? People might not like it, but deal with it. Israel faces a different world then any of us can even imagine, and I don't blame them for not caving and not relinquishing sovereignity to the fucked up organization that is the UN.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 10:42 PM   #14 (permalink)
I change
 
ARTelevision's Avatar
 
Location: USA
I think Israel's nuclear weapons are a problem. I welcome the issue being a public one.
__________________
create evolution
ARTelevision is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 11:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Fünland
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
Israel faces a different world then any of us can even imagine, and I don't blame them for not caving and not relinquishing sovereignity to the fucked up organization that is the UN.
In this thread you say that UN is too corrupt to enforce its resolutions. Yet there are numerous against Israel.

Could it be that everything that UN does contra your opinion makes it corrupt?

By the way, are you saying that all who oppose Israeli politics are antisemites?
__________________
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -- forever."
-G.O.
oktjabr is offline  
Old 07-06-2004, 11:03 PM   #16 (permalink)
Cherry-pickin' devil's advocate
 
Location: Los Angeles
Israel needs to be watched on nuclear weapons.

And honestly, I don't think they need em. They've kicked the asses of all invasions conventionally, they don't really need em.

And that plane crashing thing I believe is indeed real which is why its only scarier to have em there in teh first place.

Volatile areas + nukes = not fun.
Zeld2.0 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 03:20 AM   #17 (permalink)
Right Now
 
Location: Home
We encourage world democracies that have security concerns to ask for our help, and we will deploy security solutions. Sometimes those solutions are nuclear, sometimes not.

We discourage any country from a program that includes as a goal obtaining nukes.
Peetster is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 04:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Give Egypt nukes, and we'll call it even.
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 05:49 AM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
It's important to remember that Israel has not been threatened by another nation state in quite a while. It's present-day enemies practice asymetrical warfare within or near to Israeli territory, hardly the proper theater for nuclear conflict (if there is a "proper" theater).

Edit: I should say "seriously threatened" as Saddam Hussein did lob a few scuds in Gulf War I.

Last edited by cthulu23; 07-07-2004 at 06:16 AM..
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 06:12 AM   #20 (permalink)
Insane
 
I am going to start a turf war and make it apparent to the public that I am a victim then I will be able to arm myself even if it is against the law.
Bookman is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 06:21 AM   #21 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Unfortunately, it looks like the nuclear genie has left the bottle for good. Pakistan shared it's secrets with many nations, including non-Muslim states. There is a feeling amongst non-g8 countries that nuclear weapons will protect them and guarantee their place at the table of world leadership. They may have a point in a calculated, limited sense, but the more hands we have on the button, the more chance there is that a finger will slip.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 07:57 AM   #22 (permalink)
Junk
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
I also say anyone who bitches that they should bow to the demands of the UN can piss off.
Well that's interesting because that is the same response Israel has given the U.N for decades, especially concerning resolutions against them. But that doesn't matter because everyone is an anti-semite in the world, whether they know it or not. Agreed?

Israel constantly bitches how they don't have a voice at the U.N (as if the American voice which shadows them at every turn means nothing) meanwhile they play both sides of the fence. If they were a member they would have to comply with all U.N regulations. Since they don't want that, they make people believe they are the everlasting victims because the U.N. won't give them a voice. Funny eh? Good grief. Where is my pedestal, I want to be more important than everyone else in the world too.

To give Israel carte blanche to do as they please with WMD is as ridiculous as the Israeli's being push into the sea by their enemies. And since when is one country so damned more important than any other country in the world that they can do as they please while telling everyone to piss off at the same time. Is this how a monopoly on victimhood is solidified? Seems to be working. I think it is high time Israel is treated as an equal in the collective world scheme as opposed to a country in which the world revolves for. But that will never happen.
__________________
" In Canada, you can tell the most blatant lie in a calm voice, and people will believe you over someone who's a little passionate about the truth." David Warren, Western Standard.
OFKU0 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 08:01 AM   #23 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Quote:
Originally posted by Bookman
I am going to start a turf war and make it apparent to the public that I am a victim then I will be able to arm myself even if it is against the law.
What laws are the Israeli's breaking? What treaties? The UN only has authority when first countries relinquish power and sovereignity to it, and two (the most important part) if they can enforce their shit, which is blatantly clear, they can't.

And referring to Cthulu's post, although the Israeli's might not have been in a nation-to-nation conflict in 20 years, there is still the very real threat that Arab Muslim countries such as Iran are actively trying to obtain nukes and smuggle them into the country through the medium of terrorists groups such as hezbollah.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 08:24 AM   #24 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
What laws are the Israeli's breaking? What treaties? The UN only has authority when first countries relinquish power and sovereignity to it, and two (the most important part) if they can enforce their shit, which is blatantly clear, they can't.

And referring to Cthulu's post, although the Israeli's might not have been in a nation-to-nation conflict in 20 years, there is still the very real threat that Arab Muslim countries such as Iran are actively trying to obtain nukes and smuggle them into the country through the medium of terrorists groups such as hezbollah.
Puh-leazzzze.
They are not in compliance with the Nuclear Arms regulations.
Regardless of who is trying to get at the next person..there are rules and THEY SHOULD apply to everyone.
Bookman is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 08:26 AM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
What laws are the Israeli's breaking? What treaties? The UN only has authority when first countries relinquish power and sovereignity to it, and two (the most important part) if they can enforce their shit, which is blatantly clear, they can't.

And referring to Cthulu's post, although the Israeli's might not have been in a nation-to-nation conflict in 20 years, there is still the very real threat that Arab Muslim countries such as Iran are actively trying to obtain nukes and smuggle them into the country through the medium of terrorists groups such as hezbollah.
First off, if we are serious about nuclear non-proliferation then Israel's nuclear program must be part of the discussion. How can we pressure Iran to halt it's programs if we don't apply the same standards to Israel?

Second, although Iran has been reviving it's nuclear program, it's pure conjecture to say that they are doing so to hand off the weapons to Hezbollah. This make no real sense, as Iran is not interested in assuring their own destruction and Hezbollah probably doesn't want to irradiate their holy ground and kill untold scores of their own people in the process.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 12:10 PM   #26 (permalink)
Huggles, sir?
 
seretogis's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally posted by Bookman
Puh-leazzzze.
They are not in compliance with the Nuclear Arms regulations.
Regardless of who is trying to get at the next person..there are rules and THEY SHOULD apply to everyone.
You mean the nuclear arms treaties that they didn't even sign and so aren't subject to? Israel can have as many nukes as they want, and the UN can't (and won't) do anything about it.
__________________
seretogis - sieg heil
perfect little dream the kind that hurts the most, forgot how it feels well almost
no one to blame always the same, open my eyes wake up in flames
seretogis is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 01:19 PM   #27 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally posted by seretogis
You mean the nuclear arms treaties that they didn't even sign and so aren't subject to? Israel can have as many nukes as they want, and the UN can't (and won't) do anything about it.
By the same token, isn't Iran also free to do what they please as a nation? There is a marked difference between what a nation CAN do and what it SHOULD do.
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 02:22 PM   #28 (permalink)
Junkie
 
highthief's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Even savage nations have signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Isreal is keeping company with who - Pakistan and North Korea as far as nations that have not signed it go?
__________________
Si vis pacem parabellum.
highthief is offline  
Old 07-07-2004, 03:26 PM   #29 (permalink)
Wah
 
Location: NZ
Israel is different, because they have the US behind them no matter what they do (as far as I can see)

has the US got double standards? (yes, I know all nations have double standards ...)
__________________
pain is inevitable but misery is optional - stick a geranium in your hat and be happy
apeman is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 03:56 AM   #30 (permalink)
Right Now
 
Location: Home
Quote:
Originally posted by Bookman
Puh-leazzzze.
Danger, Will Robinson, Danger.
Peetster is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 04:47 AM   #31 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Peetster
Danger, Will Robinson, Danger.
Elaborate..
Bookman is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 06:39 AM   #32 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
Israel faces a different world then any of us can even imagine, and I don't blame them for not caving and not relinquishing sovereignity to the fucked up organization that is the UN.
In a part of the world where force and display of power are valued so highly (as well as being a stable, moderate, cooperative democracy in the ME) Israel imo should have the right to retain its regional military superiority as a matter of survival and deterrence.

edit: I see this IAEA visit as a token gesture, more in line with maintaining its own veneer of credibility and consistency more than anything else. If they want to do anything constructive, they'd do well imo to focus more attention on the insane fundamentalist mullahs in Iran who are so desperate to develop their own nuclear arsenal.

Last edited by powerclown; 07-08-2004 at 09:21 AM..
powerclown is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 07:00 AM   #33 (permalink)
Banned
 
cthulu23's Avatar
 
Who has the weapons is almost (almost, I said) immaterial. The fact that they are held in one of the least stable areas of the world is enough to make me sweat. Regardless of whether I support India or Pakistan, I really wish that neither had nukes.

Last edited by cthulu23; 07-08-2004 at 07:04 AM..
cthulu23 is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 07:15 AM   #34 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by powerclown
In a part of the world where force and display of power are valued so highly (as well as being a stable, moderate, cooperative democracy in the ME) Israel imo should have the right to retain its regional military superiority as a matter of survival and deterrence.

edit: I see this IAEA visit as a token gesture, more in line with maintaining its own veneer of credibility and consistency than anything positive. If they want to do anything constructive, they'd do well to focus more attention on the insane fundamentalist mullahs in Iran who are so desperate to develop their own nuclear arsenal.
How can it be a need to allow Israel to maintain a superiority Military-wise when the grounds for the conflict they are involved in are not justified. Regardless of how savage the Palestinians are deemed to be...this conflict over that land is not over and hardly explained. The most you hear is how savage the Arab Palestinians are and how victimized Israel is.

I wish our country, military and tax dollars could be taken OUT of that conflict. I take no side yet I can comment on how unbalanced the situation seems.

As stated earlier (above) if Israel didnt sign the UN treaties and should not be subject to the rules then why are people like Wolfwitz and Pearle writing US policy which coincide with some of their opinions and directives written in papers such as 'Securing the Realm"??
Bookman is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 09:42 AM   #35 (permalink)
Junkie
 
powerclown's Avatar
 
Location: Detroit, MI
Quote:
How can it be a need to allow Israel to maintain a superiority Military-wise when the grounds for the conflict they are involved in are not justified.
Respectfully, we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

That part of the world between the Mediterranean Sea and Jordan River and north and south has been contested for thousands of years, settled time and again by one group after another. Both religions currently living there claim the land as sacred according to their scriptures. That the Palestinans and the rest of the Arab world claim the area as their sole, Allah-given right is imo political not historical. Israel isn't going anywhere, and has the right to protect its 6.5 million citizens. I'm not saying this isn't a cause for conflict, and it takes two to tango.

Last edited by powerclown; 07-08-2004 at 09:45 AM..
powerclown is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 09:56 AM   #36 (permalink)
Cherry-pickin' devil's advocate
 
Location: Los Angeles
Anyways I find the entire nuclear weapons in Israel thing to be a bit... idiotic in a way.

You can't really protect your citizens with nuclear weapons unless you are using them to launch at the enemy. But if they decide to all invade, are you really willing to risk nuking your own country?

Not to mention, most people wouldn't want to nuke their holy land. How would it sit to nuke Jerusalem, the city of 3 religions?

Not very brilliant either way.
Zeld2.0 is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 10:10 AM   #37 (permalink)
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally posted by powerclown
Respectfully, we'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

That part of the world between the Mediterranean Sea and Jordan River and north and south has been contested for thousands of years, settled time and again by one group after another. Both religions currently living there claim the land as sacred according to their scriptures. That the Palestinans and the rest of the Arab world claim the area as their sole, Allah-given right is imo political not historical. Israel isn't going anywhere, and has the right to protect its 6.5 million citizens. I'm not saying this isn't a cause for conflict, and it takes two to tango.
My reference to that was made becuase of the moral high road being taken by Israel on the issue.

I get confused and always ask...how the hell could Britain just state that the land was Israel's anyway?
Bookman is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 10:14 AM   #38 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
First off, Tel Aviv would probably be the target, not Jerusalem. Secondly it's not a deterrent for people like the Palestinians, it's a deterrent used for countries like Syria, Iran, and up until a year ago Iraq. Third off, countries like N. Korea and Iran are asshats because they have signed the Nuke proliferation treaty and are openly and willingly defying it.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 10:17 AM   #39 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
Quote:
Originally posted by Bookman
My reference to that was made becuase of the moral high road being taken by Israel on the issue.

I get confused and always ask...how the hell could Britain just state that the land was Israel's anyway?
It wasn't Britain really, it was the UN who put it up to a vote to partition the land, which is what they ended up doing.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 07-08-2004, 10:22 AM   #40 (permalink)
Cherry-pickin' devil's advocate
 
Location: Los Angeles
And Israel isn't an asshat?

Most countries get nuclear weapons for the same weapons: Respect (prestige) and as a show of force to neighbors.

Iran and N.Korea can be asshats for not following it, but so would Israel honestly.

The only difference is they're on different sides

And of course it won't deter Palestinians given their location and proximity - nuclear weapons aren't going to be used in those situations.

And Tel Aviv is a target in what way? To cut off government, sure. But if they were going to invade, they're coming from many directions and 'liberating' a holy city would be pretty big.

I'd suggest a visit to Israel and a check out at their defense and strategy in the area anyways. Interesting stuff though I doubt this is the best time to go.

Again that is why I don't think its that big of an issue - i think its more important that nuclear weapons in the area means, their is a bigger chance they are used for the wrong reasons or enter the wrong hands.
Zeld2.0 is offline  
 

Tags
israel, nuclear, starts, visit, watchdog

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 PM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360