View Single Post
Old 06-29-2004, 03:37 PM   #18 (permalink)
splck
it's jam
 
splck's Avatar
 
Location: Lowerainland BC
He's not my MP, but the story was big around here. He was one of the more popular MP out this way.

As you can see the people voted for him in a big way with his former party getting only 4340 votes.
Chuck Cadman NA 15088
Jim Karpoff NDP 8317
Dan Sheel LIB 5413
Jasbir Singh Cheema CON 4340

Quote:
Cadman Will Run As Independent
Constituents Upset Over Nomination Process

Ottawa:
Chuck Cadman, two-term MP for the BC riding of Surrey North, declared today that he will seek re-election as an independent candidate. His decision comes a month after losing his party's nomination to a Vancouverite who joined the party in January and is virtually unknown to Surrey residents.

"Before anyone suggests otherwise, I want to emphatically state that my decision has absolutely nothing to do with any dissention on my part with respect to Stephen Harper, my Caucus colleagues or the Party - because there simply is none. This is not about dissent or differences of opinion," says Cadman. "I have assured Mr. Harper of that.

Hundreds of constituents, as well as many others from across BC and elsewhere in Canada, have contacted Cadman to express their outrage over the manner in which the Conservative Party nomination in Surrey North was, in their view, usurped. They are furious that a Vancouver resident with no connection to, or knowledge of Surrey secured the nomination by swamping the local riding association with more than 1,500 instant members, all signed up in a few weeks prior to the cut-off date.

"I have repeated what I have been told - that the rules, as they are, were apparently followed. But I still can't go anywhere in this city without people complaining to me that the process is seriously flawed and must be changed. In response, I developed and introduced a private member's bill to address their concerns but folks have made it abundantly clear to me that they want to see my name on the ballot. I have pondered this decision for weeks. I do not make it lightly as I am aware of the ramifications. However, I feel an obligation to the constituents of Surrey North who first elected me in 1997 with nearly 50% of the vote and returned me in 2000 with 56% - they want me to do this," concludes Cadman who points out that candidate selection controversies have been evident in all parties at all levels across the country


__________________
nice line eh?
splck is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360