Quote:
Originally posted by Scipio
Well, it's the only defense against the spread. (/cx debate reference)
|
Bah, that's just unwillingness to adapt to a newer aspect of the game. Spread all you want, off-case will be link-turned into advantages and on-case should be prepped with blocks to answer any viable arguments.
Then again, I pulled dirty, dirty tricks as a debater. Think Irony cases that skirt topicality with a 30 point T = no voter block, with a critique of T saying T is a form of oppression and a few hiddin RVI's and IVI's in that block. Using T answers to bind people to DA links was also a favorite evil play of mine.
/would like an aisle seat to cx debater hell
__________________
I'm leaving for the University of California: Santa Barbara in 5 hours, give me your best college advice - things I need, good ideas, bad ideas, nooky, ect.
Originally Posted by Norseman on another forum:
"Yeah, the problem with the world is the stupid people are all cocksure of themselves and the intellectuals are full of doubt."
Last edited by nanofever; 05-26-2004 at 10:44 PM..
|