View Single Post
Old 03-21-2004, 10:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
iccky
Psycho
 
iccky's Avatar
 
Location: Princeton, NJ
Quote:
Daily, the issues are emailed to the constituency, they vote on it, the returns are tabulated and the representative votes the majority. If there is a deviation from the majority vote, the representative goes to prison. Case closed. That way the majority rules, Lobbyists are eliminated and you have a true democracy.
There are a number of problems with this. I'll just say three of them.

1. The people do not, and can not, understand all of the complexities of every issue that comes up before every level of government. Its not a matter of the people being stupid, its a metter of the huge time commitment that this would require.

Which leads me to point number two...

2. The vast majority of people will not commit the time necessary for democracy that is any more direct then what we have now. If you look at any polls of public knowledge about government, you find that most people don't know even the most basic facts about government. Its not because information about government is hard to come by, and, again, its not because they're stupid. Its because they have better things to do then be political junkies. Only a very small segment of the population pays enought attention to make this sort of thing work. The rest simply won't participate.

Which leads to point number three...

3. Since most people have better things to do then be political junkies, this sort of government (or, indeed, any further devolution of power to "the people") would not be rule by "the people." It would be an oligarchy of political junkies, like you and me. Which would be really great for you and me, but you could hardly call it democracy. And, lets face it, political junkies are hardly representative of the rest of America. We're wealthier, more educated, and I imagine whiter.

In short, this sort of system would not bring about more democracy. It would bring about an oligarchy of educated people with a lot of time on their hands. Which is fine if thats what you're going for, but please don't call it democracy or rule by "the people".

Sorry for this horrible threadjack, it just really gets my juices up when people propose things like this.

Last edited by iccky; 03-22-2004 at 06:48 AM..
iccky is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360