I still think there is a difference. We have carbon dating to tell us how old things are, and knowledge about how layers of rocks are formed to back that up.
Are you talking about [bold]all[/bold] evolution or just the theory that humans are related to early apes? Evolution on the small scale is as proven as a theory can be proven. We *know* that life forms adapt to their surroundings because we've observed it happening again and again.
Quote:
|
other wise it would not have so many holes and need so many updates and improvements in it's theories and postulations.
|
Science is always being built upon. Sure some things turn out to be different than we though, but the idea is that with each revision it becomes more exact than before.