01-08-2006, 11:45 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Soylent Green is people.
Location: Northern California
|
Kimber Custom Eclipse II - my first 1911
I'm a black-guns only kinda guy (Glock, HK USP Compact ...) ... but I had a moment of weakness just yesterday and bought a Kimber Custom Eclipse II .45. It was just too damn pretty to ignore.
If California didn't have this 10 day waiting period I'd be posting pics right now. Until then you'll just have to settle for stock photos. Mine is like this one except I have combat sights instead of the adjustable. Any other Kimber owners out there to grunt approvingly? Believe it or not I own a lot of guns but not a single 1911 - until now. That's because I shot my buddy's Jardine full house custom .45 - and it's hard to settle for anything less in a 1911. The Kimber ain't in the same class (the Jardine was $3Kish) but it'll do for me. His is similar to the one depicted below except his roll markings are of a Colt Series 80. Last edited by longbough; 01-08-2006 at 12:14 PM.. |
01-08-2006, 12:48 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Cracking the Whip
Location: Sexymama's arms...
|
There's no doubt that's a pretty gun and Kimber has a great rep.
After shooting a USP and a 1911, my personal preference for a .45 is the USP, but to no one can fault your choice.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU! Please Donate! |
01-08-2006, 01:07 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Soylent Green is people.
Location: Northern California
|
I do own a USP Compact .45 which I absolutely adore. I carry cocked and locked and the USPC is a workhorse. I still plan to get a fullsize USP in the future.
But why settle for one or the other when you can have both? What I always liked about the 1911 was its slimness of the gun as well as the single stack magazines. Most of all a well-built 1911 can have the sweetest trigger you're ever going to find. In terms of combat practicality I can still shoot the lights out with my Glock's trigger though. All in all, this wasn't a logical decision ... it was more an emotional reflex. Any advice on full sized USPs? I generally don't like guns that are bigger than they need to be - but the USP .45 has a 12 rd capacity and I understand it shoots quite nicely. (And I'd rather have a USP than a ParaOrd or double-stack 1911) My USPC is not as big as I thougt it'd be - probably the oversized trigger guard gives it an illusion of bulk. IMO - the USP is supposed to be a .45 ... why anyone would shoot 9 or 40 in one is beyond me - IMO it's like getting a S&W N-frame .32 (no such thing) - it just don't compute. Last edited by longbough; 01-08-2006 at 01:19 PM.. |
01-08-2006, 01:24 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Twitterpated
Location: My own little world (also Canada)
|
Well isn't .40 supposedly as effective (or almost) as .45? If so, it's just a matter of fitting more bullets into the frame. (that, and slightly cheaper ammo)
__________________
"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something." - Plato |
01-08-2006, 01:46 PM | #5 (permalink) | |
Soylent Green is people.
Location: Northern California
|
Quote:
I shoot both .40 and .45. It might be all in my head but the .45 is a tad more exciting to shoot. For practical purposes my carry weapon (...err.... assuming if I was carrying, of course ... yeah ... assuming) is a Glock 23 - a .40 with 13 rds. I carry a spare Glock 22 mag .40 with 15 rds as well (... err... if I were carrying, of course). |
|
01-08-2006, 02:55 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Myrmidon
Location: In the twilight and mist.
|
nice peice...
I think you may be surprised just how little your friends three thousand dollar gun has on the kimber you picked out. edit: .40 is a clusterfuck of a round. I still can't believe how the whole damn thing came about but anywho, .45 is more controllable to me, push vs jab, yadda yadda, botom line is along as it starts with a 4, it's good advice on the USP .45, well, the XD's are coming out in .45 caliber, mebbe take a look at those before you commit. I want a full size USP too, just might be hard to conceal.
__________________
Ron Paul '08 Vote for Freedom Go ahead and google Dr. Ron Paul. You'll like what you read. Last edited by ziadel; 01-08-2006 at 03:01 PM.. |
01-11-2006, 08:31 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Insane
Location: Hawaii
|
That looks nice, makes me want to go out and buy a full size 1911 .45. Can't wait to see the picts of yours.
I own a Kimber .45 Ultra Compact Sport 1911. It's a shorty that's easy to carry. The 8 round mag kills me but hey what do you expect for something that's easy to conceal.... that is um if I concealed my weapon.
__________________
Freedom is NOT Free. |
01-18-2006, 10:26 AM | #11 (permalink) |
ARRRRRRRRRR
Location: Stuart, Florida
|
I was kicking myself this weekend. If I hadnt bought a new dvd playe last week I would have had the cash for the Kimber I saw at the gun shop when I went shooting Saturday. I don't remember what model it was but it was a brand new full size kimber for $500. I've been wanting a Kimber for a while now and for that price I was half tempted to let a couple bills slide for a couple weeks. But alas.....the bills are paid and I'm still Kimberless.
|
Tags |
1911, custom, eclipse, kimber |
|
|