Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Weaponry (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-weaponry/)
-   -   Interesting Cop/Open Carry interaction on video. (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-weaponry/176808-interesting-cop-open-carry-interaction-video.html)

Borla 07-22-2011 04:41 AM

Interesting Cop/Open Carry interaction on video.
 
You see lots of these posted that are made to putt egg on LEOs faces for not knowing or enforcing the laws properly. The cop's actions in this one are pretty stellar, and if anything the guy Open Carrying looks foolish IMO for not extending the same respect that he's getting shown by the officer.


KirStang 07-22-2011 05:15 AM

Very professional, shows how good law enforcement can be stellar.

ChrisJericho 07-22-2011 05:54 AM

It's refreshing to see an encounter where the officer actually knows the laws he is supposed to enforce. I'm not a fan of open carry because I want the element of surprise and I don't like attracting attention to myself, but given how the officer mentions youtube maybe these open carriers are actually accomplishing something.

However I do find it strange that the officer is former military, and I assume took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, yet he is enforcing laws that ensure citizens are forced to be disarmed in public.

Oh well, I'll just stay out of California. :)

KirStang 07-22-2011 06:18 AM

Eh, as niner says, we're only there to enforce the decisions of the higher ups. The Rkba in public is still winding its way through courts so it isn't per se unconstitutional.

Borla 07-22-2011 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisJericho (Post 2916772)
However I do find it strange that the officer is former military, and I assume took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, yet he is enforcing laws that ensure citizens are forced to be disarmed in public.

Also as designated by our Constitution, that's for the Judicial Branch to sort out, not a police officer making a personal call on the street.

KirStang 07-22-2011 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Borla (Post 2916781)
Also as designated by our Constitution, that's for the Judicial Branch to sort out, not a police officer making a personal call on the street.

Although Article III mentions jurisdiction "arising under the Constitution," it isn't strictly delegated in our Constitution. The Supreme Court made a power grab very very early on in our Nation's history, thus designating themselves as the ultimate arbiters of the Constitution. The tradition has been respected since. Very shrewd move.

See: Marbury v. Madison

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

Borla 07-22-2011 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KirStang (Post 2916826)
Although Article III mentions jurisdiction "arising under the Constitution," it isn't strictly delegated in our Constitution. The Supreme Court made a power grab very very early on in our Nation's history, thus designating themselves as the ultimate arbiters of the Constitution. The tradition has been respected since. Very shrewd move.

See: Marbury v. Madison

Marbury v. Madison - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But the legal precedent in this country is for the judicial branch to review and disqualify laws, not for law enforcement officers to do so.

As much as people whine about what cops do now, it would be exponentially worse if we also had individual officers deciding on their own what was Constitutional and what wasn't.

Plan9 07-22-2011 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Borla (Post 2916857)
But the legal precedent in this country is for the judicial branch to review and disqualify laws, not for law enforcement officers to do so.

As much as people whine about what cops do now, it would be exponentially worse if we also had individual officers deciding on their own what was Constitutional and what wasn't.

Newsflash: Police officer discretion, the single most dynamic part of law enforcement, isn't written into the Constitution.

That and the Constitution has little relevance given the incredible bulk of standing local, state and federal laws in existence.

Anybody that mentions the fucking Constitution in a 2011 RKBA debate might as well wear a "Don't Tread On Me" t-shirt.

...

Edit:

The opposite side of the coin:

Ohio Police Officer Threatens to Kill CCW Holder at Traffic Stop

Ilow 07-22-2011 04:47 PM

Wow that first officer was unbelievably professional, I would buy that guy a beer 10 times out of 10. And the second one, frankly sends shivers up my spine.

KirStang 07-22-2011 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ilow (Post 2916911)
Wow that first officer was unbelievably professional, I would buy that guy a beer 10 times out of 10. And the second one, frankly sends shivers up my spine.

....That second officer....What the fuck?

Unbelievably unprofessional.

dksuddeth 07-23-2011 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Borla (Post 2916857)
But the legal precedent in this country is for the judicial branch to review and disqualify laws, not for law enforcement officers to do so.

As much as people whine about what cops do now, it would be exponentially worse if we also had individual officers deciding on their own what was Constitutional and what wasn't.

can you tell me what the ratification date was for the constitution that was written by the supreme court?

---------- Post added at 11:19 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 AM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plan9 (Post 2916868)
Anybody that mentions the fucking Constitution in a 2011 RKBA debate might as well wear a "Don't Tread On Me" t-shirt.

Did we decide to throw the constitution away after the civil war or something?

if so, someone forgot to tell me.

Borla 07-23-2011 04:11 PM

I guess maybe we need to move this into Tilted Paranoia if we keep going down this path. :o

I was more referring to the accepted laws of the land as currently practiced, not personal interpretations of how they should be.

KirStang 07-23-2011 06:48 PM

Meh, I'm just pointing things out. If you're going to bullshit on the internet, you might as well know what you're talking about.

Plan9 07-24-2011 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dksuddeth (Post 2917054)
Did we decide to throw the constitution away after the civil war or something? if so, someone forgot to tell me.

Where this is going eventually... I'll get right to it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360