![]() |
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |||
Future Bureaucrat
|
ATF to exclude Saiga12 from importation
http://www.atf.gov/publications/fire...n-shotguns.pdf
1.) Extreme narrow interpretation of "sporting purpose." Basically excludes all IDPA/IPSC/3-gun type activities from the term 'sporting purpose.' Instead, the ATF proposes to narrowly construes 'sporting purpose' to only include bird hunting and skeet. (Sound familiar?) Quote:
Quote:
This report is only the study to influence a proposed regulation--If you feel that this interpretation is improper, as it blithely ignores sport-shooting (IPSC/IDPA/3Gun) as a sport and instead carries to the 'hunting-bubba' interpretation, please do not hesitate to write to the ATF. I will be sending the ATF a letter voicing my discomfort with their narrow interpretation of sporting purpose. (I AM NOT A LAWYER) Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) section 553, agencies must propose a new rule, provide the opportunity for notice and hearing, before adopting a final rule. This looks like ATF's first step in a long line of procedure to amend the importation regulations.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by KirStang; 01-30-2011 at 12:45 PM.. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
hopefully this gets challenged and voided. heller and mcdonald should do away with the sporting purpose issue.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Future Bureaucrat
|
I am disturbed by the ATFs interpretation of sports.
Based on their interpretation, 'sporting purpose' only involves things like shooting animals, shooting inanimate clay objects, or maybe even the competitive enterprise of throwing oblong balls down a striped field. It just reflects a world view that I am uncomfortable with. I have not studied the legislative history of the GCAs, but I suppose the reason the GCAs excluded non sporting weapons was to limit importation of weapons which made killing people easier. Rather than go through the fiction of calling IDPA/IPSC/3gun not a "sport" I wish they would just say what they wanted to say--"we don't want to import guns that make it easier to kill people."
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by KirStang; 01-30-2011 at 02:00 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 (permalink) |
I'm calmer than you are, dude
Location: North Carolina
|
I don't understand the ATF's proposed exemption. Does the term "light enhancing devices" refer to flashlights?
Because it sucks and it causes you to lose your faith in humanity. But driving fast is really cool.
__________________
Calmer than you are... |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | ||
Future Bureaucrat
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
i wouldn't like what the experience would do for my ethics, morals, and principals.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 (permalink) | |
Future Bureaucrat
|
Well, the restriction is on importing shotguns which are should only be imported if they have a 'sporting purpose.' Because shooting a badguy at 2 am in your darkly lit home is not a 'sporting purpose,' the ATF defines rails and lights as unimportable.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
atf, exclude, importation, saiga12 |
|
|